Validation of the Sysmex XN-V hematology analyzer for feline specimens

© 2024 The Author(s). Veterinary Clinical Pathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary clinical pathology. - 1975. - 53(2024), 3 vom: 17. Sept., Seite 294-308
1. Verfasser: Guerlin, Maud (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Granat, Fanny, Grebert, Margot, Braun, Jean-Pierre, Geffré, Anne, Bourgès-Abella, Nathalie, Trumel, Catherine
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Veterinary clinical pathology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Validation Study blood cat comparison study method validation platelet clumping
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2024 The Author(s). Veterinary Clinical Pathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.
BACKGROUND: The Sysmex XN-V is derived from the new Sysmex XN series of human hematology analyzers. The main changes from the previously validated XT-2000iV analyzer include an optic-fluorescent analysis for platelets and a nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) count
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the Sysmex XN-V for feline blood following the American College for Veterinary Clinical Pathology and International Council for Standardization in Hematology recommendations
METHODS: Feline EDTA blood specimens were analyzed on the Sysmex XN-V to evaluate repeatability, linearity, comparison with the XT-2000iV analyzer and manual methods, stability, and to verify the previously established Sysmex XT-2000iV RIs
RESULTS: Repeatability was excellent for most variables. Visually determined linearity was excellent or good for most variables except eosinophils and platelet variables. The correlation between the XN-V and XT-2000iV analyzers was good (≥0.82) for all variables except reticulocyte indices. Correlations between the Sysmex XN-V and manual differential counts were good to excellent for most variables, acceptable for neutrophils, and fair for monocytes and NRBC. The previously established Sysmex XT-2000iV RIs can be used to interpret results from the Sysmex XN-V analyzer for most variables except red cell distribution width and reticulocyte variables. The RI for platelet variables could not be evaluated because of platelet clumps. Changes in the Sysmex XN-V measurements after storage at 4 and 24°C were similar to those described for the Sysmex XT-2000iV analyzer
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the Sysmex XN-V analyzer was good and compared favorably with the Sysmex XT-2000iV analyzer
Beschreibung:Date Completed 24.09.2024
Date Revised 24.09.2024
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1939-165X
DOI:10.1111/vcp.13377