How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment

© The Author(s) 2023.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of management. - 1998. - 50(2024), 7 vom: 10. Aug., Seite 2641-2674
1. Verfasser: Gloor, Jamie L (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Okimoto, Tyler G, Li, Xinxin, Gazdag, Brooke A, Ryan, Michelle K
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of management
Schlagworte:Journal Article attributions bystander discrimination feminist identity gender identity identification incivility intervention mistreatment mehr... organizational identity third party
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© The Author(s) 2023.
Integrating a social identity approach with Cortina's (2008) theorizing about selective incivility as modern discrimination, we examine how identification-with an organization, with one's gender, and as a feminist-shapes bystanders' interpretations and responses to witnessed incivility (i.e., interpersonal acts of disrespect) and selective incivility (i.e., incivility motivated by targets' social group membership) toward women at work. We propose that bystanders with stronger organizational identification are less likely to perceive incivility toward female colleagues as discrimination and intervene, but female bystanders with stronger gender identification are more likely to do so. Results from two-wave field data in a cross-lagged panel design (Study 1, N = 336) showed that organizational identification negatively predicted observed selective incivility 1 year later but revealed no evidence of an effect of female bystanders' gender identification. We replicated and extended these results with a vignette experiment (Study 2, N = 410) and an experimental recall study (Study 3, N = 504). Findings revealed a "dark side" of organizational identification: strongly identified bystanders were less likely to perceive incivility as discrimination, but there were again no effects of women's gender identification. Study 3 also showed that bystander feminist identification increased intervention via perceived discrimination. These results raise doubts that female bystanders are more sensitive to recognizing other women's mistreatment as discrimination, but more strongly identified feminists (male or female) were more likely to intervene. Although strongly organizationally identified bystanders were more likely to overlook women's mistreatment, they were also more likely to intervene once discrimination was apparent
Beschreibung:Date Revised 27.08.2024
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:0149-2063
DOI:10.1177/01492063231177976