Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty : metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs

© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 8(2024), 4 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 845-850
1. Verfasser: Wittmann, Thomas (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Denard, Patrick J, Werner, Brian C, Raiss, Patric
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article BIO-RSA Increased glenoid offset Lateralization Metal increased offset Reverse shoulder arthroplasty Shoulder replacement
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM375232508
003 DE-627
005 20240723233634.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240722s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.006  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1479.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM375232508 
035 |a (NLM)39035637 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Wittmann, Thomas  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty  |b metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 23.07.2024 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. 
520 |a Background: Higher bone or metal glenoid offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) reduces scapular notching, improves range of motion (ROM), and reduces postoperative instability. This retrospective multicenter study compared two implant designs to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic results of bone increased offset RSA (BIO-RSA) and metal increased offset RSA (MIO-RSA) in reverse shoulder. We hypothesized no difference between groups 
520 |a Methods: This study analyzed n = 62 BIO-RSA and n = 90 MIO-RSA cases with a mean follow-up of 29.7 ± 6.0 months (BIO-RSA, range 24-49 months) and 24.0 ± 1.1 months (MIO-RSA, range 22-28 months). A 145°-onlay humeral stem was utilized in BIO-RSA cases, while a 135°-semi-inlay humeral stem was implanted in all MIO-RSA cases. Preoperative and postoperative radiologic imaging was reviewed to identify signs of scapular notching. Additionally, lateralization was evaluated according to Erickson et al. The constant score, subjective shoulder value, and ROM were evaluated during the baseline and follow-up consultations, and the findings of both groups were subsequently compared 
520 |a Results: Scapular notching was observed in 7.0% (n = 8) of MIO-RSA cases and 8.1% (n = 5) of BIO-RSA cases (P = .801). MIO-group had a higher lateralization angle (P = .020) and the BIO-group had a higher distalization angle (P = .005). At baseline, mean constant score in the MIO-RSA group was higher than in the BIO-RSA group (P < .001), and it significantly increased to 67.8 ± 12.1P (MIO-RSA) and 69.5 ± 12.3P (BIO-RSA) to a similar level (P = .399). ROM improved in both groups with no significant difference between the two groups at follow-up 
520 |a Conclusion: BIO-RSA and MIO-RSA in two distinct implant designs provide comparable short-term outcomes with a similar increase in shoulder function with notable variations in the lateralization and distalization angles between both implants. Scapular notching was rarely seen and unaffected by the method of glenoid lateralization. Follow-up investigations of both techniques are necessary to complement and track changes in the long-term outcome 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a BIO-RSA 
650 4 |a Increased glenoid offset 
650 4 |a Lateralization 
650 4 |a Metal increased offset 
650 4 |a Reverse shoulder arthroplasty 
650 4 |a Shoulder replacement 
700 1 |a Denard, Patrick J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Werner, Brian C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Raiss, Patric  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JSES international  |d 2020  |g 8(2024), 4 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 845-850  |w (DE-627)NLM307818438  |x 2666-6383  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2024  |g number:4  |g day:04  |g month:07  |g pages:845-850 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.006  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 8  |j 2024  |e 4  |b 04  |c 07  |h 845-850