Glenoid lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty : metal vs. bone offset in different implant designs
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.
| Veröffentlicht in: | JSES international. - 2020. - 8(2024), 4 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 845-850 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | JSES international |
| Schlagworte: | Journal Article BIO-RSA Increased glenoid offset Lateralization Metal increased offset Reverse shoulder arthroplasty Shoulder replacement |
| Zusammenfassung: | © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. Background: Higher bone or metal glenoid offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) reduces scapular notching, improves range of motion (ROM), and reduces postoperative instability. This retrospective multicenter study compared two implant designs to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiologic results of bone increased offset RSA (BIO-RSA) and metal increased offset RSA (MIO-RSA) in reverse shoulder. We hypothesized no difference between groups Methods: This study analyzed n = 62 BIO-RSA and n = 90 MIO-RSA cases with a mean follow-up of 29.7 ± 6.0 months (BIO-RSA, range 24-49 months) and 24.0 ± 1.1 months (MIO-RSA, range 22-28 months). A 145°-onlay humeral stem was utilized in BIO-RSA cases, while a 135°-semi-inlay humeral stem was implanted in all MIO-RSA cases. Preoperative and postoperative radiologic imaging was reviewed to identify signs of scapular notching. Additionally, lateralization was evaluated according to Erickson et al. The constant score, subjective shoulder value, and ROM were evaluated during the baseline and follow-up consultations, and the findings of both groups were subsequently compared Results: Scapular notching was observed in 7.0% (n = 8) of MIO-RSA cases and 8.1% (n = 5) of BIO-RSA cases (P = .801). MIO-group had a higher lateralization angle (P = .020) and the BIO-group had a higher distalization angle (P = .005). At baseline, mean constant score in the MIO-RSA group was higher than in the BIO-RSA group (P < .001), and it significantly increased to 67.8 ± 12.1P (MIO-RSA) and 69.5 ± 12.3P (BIO-RSA) to a similar level (P = .399). ROM improved in both groups with no significant difference between the two groups at follow-up Conclusion: BIO-RSA and MIO-RSA in two distinct implant designs provide comparable short-term outcomes with a similar increase in shoulder function with notable variations in the lateralization and distalization angles between both implants. Scapular notching was rarely seen and unaffected by the method of glenoid lateralization. Follow-up investigations of both techniques are necessary to complement and track changes in the long-term outcome |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Revised 23.07.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 2666-6383 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.006 |