|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM352285680 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231226053351.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1007/s10648-023-09727-3
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1174.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM352285680
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)36718181
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Kucirkova, Natalia
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Commentary on Highly Successful Female Educational Psychologists
|b Equity and Intersectionality in Success Definitions
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2023
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 14.03.2023
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © The Author(s) 2023.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Despite the international focus on validation and success indicators of academic work across disciplines, examples of accomplished educational psychologists and their personal stories have been limited in the literature. Prinz et al. (2021) interviewed Five Highly Successful Female Educational Psychologists and offered a content analysis of their success stories, including the academics' strategies and trademark characteristics. In this Commentary, I expand on their findings in light of equity and intersectionality perspectives on academic success. I problematise academic success indicators (publication records and impact) with reference to literature on gender disparities in publication metrics and lack of inclusivity in generic measures of academic success. I outline how individual success narratives intersect with our collective responsibility for higher wellbeing and professional recognition of all colleagues. I argue that the equity and intersectionality perspectives are fundamental to inclusive narratives of success and highlight the power structures that have historically impeded access of diverse and minority scholars to top academic positions. I conclude with four recommendations for addressing the persistent structures of inequities in academic career opportunities
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Review
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Equity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Gender
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Intersectionality
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Scholarly success
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Women in science
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Educational psychology review
|d 1998
|g 35(2023), 1 vom: 05., Seite 7
|w (DE-627)NLM098206230
|x 1040-726X
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:35
|g year:2023
|g number:1
|g day:05
|g pages:7
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09727-3
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 35
|j 2023
|e 1
|b 05
|h 7
|