Development of 3D cultures of zebrafish liver and embryo cell lines : a comparison of different spheroid formation methods

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecotoxicology (London, England). - 1992. - 30(2021), 9 vom: 11. Nov., Seite 1893-1909
1. Verfasser: de Souza, Irisdoris Rodrigues (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Canavez, Andrezza Di Pietro Micali, Schuck, Desiree Cigaran, Gagosian, Viviana Stephanie Costa, de Souza, Isisdoris Rodrigues, Vicari, Taynah, da Silva Trindade, Edvaldo, Cestari, Marta Margarete, Lorencini, Marcio, Leme, Daniela Morais
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ecotoxicology (London, England)
Schlagworte:Journal Article 3D cell culture Alternative methods Ecotoxicology Fish cell lines Hanging drop Orbital shaking
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Fish cell spheroids are promising 3D culture models for vertebrate replacement in ecotoxicology. However, new alternative ecotoxicological methods must be adapted for applications in industry and for regulatory purposes; such methods must be cost-effective, simple to manipulate and provide rapid results. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness of the traditional hanging drop (HD), orbital shaking (OS), and HD combined with OS (HD+OS) methods on the formation of zebrafish cell line spheroids (ZFL and ZEM2S). Time in HD (3-5 days) and different 96-well plates [flat-bottom or ultra-low attachment of round-bottom (ULA-plates)] in OS were evaluated. Easy handling, rapid spheroid formation, uniform-sized spheroids, and circularity were assessed to identify the best spheroid protocol. Traditional HD alone did not result in ZFL spheroid formation, whereas HD (5 days)+OS did. When using the OS, spheroids only formed on the ULA-plate. Both HD+OS and OS were reproducible in size (177.50 ± 2.81 µm and 225.62 ± 19.20 µm, respectively) and circularity (0.83 ± 0.02 and 0.80 ± 0.01, respectively) of ZFL spheroids. Nevertheless, HD+OS required a considerable time to completely form spheroids (10 days) and intensive handling, whereas the OS was fast (5 days of incubation) and simple. OS also yielded reproducible ZEM2S spheroids in 1 day (226.23 ± 0.57 µm diameter and 0.80 ± 0.01 circularity). In conclusion, OS in ULA-plate is an effective and simple spheroid protocol for high-throughput ecotoxicity testing. This study contributes to identify a fast, reproducible, and simple protocol of single piscine spheroid formation in 96-well plates and supports the application of fish 3D model in industry and academia
Beschreibung:Date Completed 02.11.2021
Date Revised 02.11.2021
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1573-3017
DOI:10.1007/s10646-021-02459-6