Adsorption - Membrane process for treatment of stabilized municipal landfill leachate

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (New York, N.Y.). - 1999. - 114(2020) vom: 01. Aug., Seite 174-182
1. Verfasser: Zielińska, Magdalena (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Kulikowska, Dorota, Stańczak, Marcin
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
Schlagworte:Journal Article Ceramic membranes Fine-ultrafiltration (fine-UF) Microfiltration (MF) Powdered activated carbon Ultrafiltration (UF) Membranes, Artificial Water Pollutants, Chemical Charcoal 16291-96-6
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM312558090
003 DE-627
005 20250227150820.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.011  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1041.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM312558090 
035 |a (NLM)32679475 
035 |a (PII)S0956-053X(20)30377-9 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Zielińska, Magdalena  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Adsorption - Membrane process for treatment of stabilized municipal landfill leachate 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 04.08.2020 
500 |a Date Revised 04.08.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 
520 |a The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of removal of difficult-to-biodegrade organic compounds from real stabilized landfill leachate with a membrane process alone and in combination with powdered-activated-carbon (PAC) adsorption. For filtration, ceramic membranes were used. The characteristics of the raw leachate were 788 mg COD/L and color of 0.4458 cm-1. With all combinations of PAC-adsorption and a membrane process (MF, UF, fine-UF) and with fine-UF alone, leachate treatment was highly efficient. For each membrane, treatment was more efficient when the membrane process was combined with PAC addition. This means that adsorption (PAC dose 3 g/L, adsorption time 30 min) made the largest contribution to leachate treatment (COD and color removal efficiency of 73.1% and 94.4%, respectively). In all cases, organic particles bigger than 100 kDa were removed most efficiently, whereas particles smaller than 3 kDa were removed least efficiently. The efficiency of leachate treatment with PAC + MF, PAC + UF and PAC + fine-UF did not differ significantly (>87% COD and > 97% color). With regard to membrane flux, however, these combinations can be ranked in the following order: PAC + MF > PAC + UF > PAC + fine-UF. Therefore, PAC + MF (0.3 MPa) was selected as the most effective solution (COD and color removal efficiencies of 87.8% and 97.2%, respectively; permeate flux of 167.6 L/(m2∙h)), as it combined efficient pollutant removal with low membrane pressure 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Ceramic membranes 
650 4 |a Fine-ultrafiltration (fine-UF) 
650 4 |a Microfiltration (MF) 
650 4 |a Powdered activated carbon 
650 4 |a Ultrafiltration (UF) 
650 7 |a Membranes, Artificial  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Water Pollutants, Chemical  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Charcoal  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 16291-96-6  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Kulikowska, Dorota  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stańczak, Marcin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Waste management (New York, N.Y.)  |d 1999  |g 114(2020) vom: 01. Aug., Seite 174-182  |w (DE-627)NLM098197061  |x 1879-2456  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:114  |g year:2020  |g day:01  |g month:08  |g pages:174-182 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.011  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 114  |j 2020  |b 01  |c 08  |h 174-182