Adsorption - Membrane process for treatment of stabilized municipal landfill leachate
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (New York, N.Y.). - 1999. - 114(2020) vom: 01. Aug., Seite 174-182 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2020
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Waste management (New York, N.Y.) |
Schlagworte: | Journal Article Ceramic membranes Fine-ultrafiltration (fine-UF) Microfiltration (MF) Powdered activated carbon Ultrafiltration (UF) Membranes, Artificial Water Pollutants, Chemical Charcoal 16291-96-6 |
Zusammenfassung: | Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of removal of difficult-to-biodegrade organic compounds from real stabilized landfill leachate with a membrane process alone and in combination with powdered-activated-carbon (PAC) adsorption. For filtration, ceramic membranes were used. The characteristics of the raw leachate were 788 mg COD/L and color of 0.4458 cm-1. With all combinations of PAC-adsorption and a membrane process (MF, UF, fine-UF) and with fine-UF alone, leachate treatment was highly efficient. For each membrane, treatment was more efficient when the membrane process was combined with PAC addition. This means that adsorption (PAC dose 3 g/L, adsorption time 30 min) made the largest contribution to leachate treatment (COD and color removal efficiency of 73.1% and 94.4%, respectively). In all cases, organic particles bigger than 100 kDa were removed most efficiently, whereas particles smaller than 3 kDa were removed least efficiently. The efficiency of leachate treatment with PAC + MF, PAC + UF and PAC + fine-UF did not differ significantly (>87% COD and > 97% color). With regard to membrane flux, however, these combinations can be ranked in the following order: PAC + MF > PAC + UF > PAC + fine-UF. Therefore, PAC + MF (0.3 MPa) was selected as the most effective solution (COD and color removal efficiencies of 87.8% and 97.2%, respectively; permeate flux of 167.6 L/(m2∙h)), as it combined efficient pollutant removal with low membrane pressure |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 04.08.2020 Date Revised 04.08.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1879-2456 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.011 |