Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?

© 2019 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology. - 1999. - 26(2020), 3 vom: 01. März, Seite 1532-1575
1. Verfasser: Smith, Pete (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Calvin, Katherine, Nkem, Johnson, Campbell, Donovan, Cherubini, Francesco, Grassi, Giacomo, Korotkov, Vladimir, Le Hoang, Anh, Lwasa, Shuaib, McElwee, Pamela, Nkonya, Ephraim, Saigusa, Nobuko, Soussana, Jean-Francois, Taboada, Miguel Angel, Manning, Frances C, Nampanzira, Dorothy, Arias-Navarro, Cristina, Vizzarri, Matteo, House, Jo, Roe, Stephanie, Cowie, Annette, Rounsevell, Mark, Arneth, Almut
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Global change biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't adaptation adverse side effects co-benefits demand management desertification food security land degradation land management mehr... mitigation practice risk management
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM302440011
003 DE-627
005 20240328232454.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/gcb.14878  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1352.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM302440011 
035 |a (NLM)31637793 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Smith, Pete  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification? 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 19.03.2020 
500 |a Date Revised 28.03.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2019 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 
520 |a There is a clear need for transformative change in the land management and food production sectors to address the global land challenges of climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, combatting land degradation and desertification, and delivering food security (referred to hereafter as "land challenges"). We assess the potential for 40 practices to address these land challenges and find that: Nine options deliver medium to large benefits for all four land challenges. A further two options have no global estimates for adaptation, but have medium to large benefits for all other land challenges. Five options have large mitigation potential (>3 Gt CO2 eq/year) without adverse impacts on the other land challenges. Five options have moderate mitigation potential, with no adverse impacts on the other land challenges. Sixteen practices have large adaptation potential (>25 million people benefit), without adverse side effects on other land challenges. Most practices can be applied without competing for available land. However, seven options could result in competition for land. A large number of practices do not require dedicated land, including several land management options, all value chain options, and all risk management options. Four options could greatly increase competition for land if applied at a large scale, though the impact is scale and context specific, highlighting the need for safeguards to ensure that expansion of land for mitigation does not impact natural systems and food security. A number of practices, such as increased food productivity, dietary change and reduced food loss and waste, can reduce demand for land conversion, thereby potentially freeing-up land and creating opportunities for enhanced implementation of other practices, making them important components of portfolios of practices to address the combined land challenges 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a adaptation 
650 4 |a adverse side effects 
650 4 |a co-benefits 
650 4 |a demand management 
650 4 |a desertification 
650 4 |a food security 
650 4 |a land degradation 
650 4 |a land management 
650 4 |a mitigation 
650 4 |a practice 
650 4 |a risk management 
700 1 |a Calvin, Katherine  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nkem, Johnson  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Campbell, Donovan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cherubini, Francesco  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Grassi, Giacomo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Korotkov, Vladimir  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Le Hoang, Anh  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lwasa, Shuaib  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McElwee, Pamela  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nkonya, Ephraim  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Saigusa, Nobuko  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Soussana, Jean-Francois  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Taboada, Miguel Angel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Manning, Frances C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nampanzira, Dorothy  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Arias-Navarro, Cristina  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vizzarri, Matteo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a House, Jo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roe, Stephanie  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cowie, Annette  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rounsevell, Mark  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Arneth, Almut  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Global change biology  |d 1999  |g 26(2020), 3 vom: 01. März, Seite 1532-1575  |w (DE-627)NLM098239996  |x 1365-2486  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g day:01  |g month:03  |g pages:1532-1575 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14878  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 26  |j 2020  |e 3  |b 01  |c 03  |h 1532-1575