Computational Assessment of MLCT versus MC Stabilities in First-to-Third-Row d6 Pseudo-Octahedral Transition Metal Complexes

© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational chemistry. - 1984. - 40(2019), 27 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 2377-2390
1. Verfasser: Batlogg, Aymerick (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Fumanal, Maria
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of computational chemistry
Schlagworte:Journal Article density functional theory excited state energies transition metal complexes wave-function theory
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM298643944
003 DE-627
005 20231225094615.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/jcc.26014  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0995.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM298643944 
035 |a (NLM)31250472 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Batlogg, Aymerick  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Computational Assessment of MLCT versus MC Stabilities in First-to-Third-Row d6 Pseudo-Octahedral Transition Metal Complexes 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 08.01.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 
520 |a An accurate modeling of metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (MLCT) and metal-centered (MC) excited state energies is key to predict the photoinduced response in transition metal complexes (TMCs). Herein, the importance of the ground state and excited state reference geometries is addressed for three-prototype d6 pseudo-octahedral TMCs, each displaying a different potential energy landscape of MLCT versus MC relative stabilities. Several functionals are used within the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT), as well as multireference wave-function theory (MS-CASPT2), applied to [Mn(im)(CO)3 (phen)]+ , [Ru(im)2 (bpy)2 ]2+ , and [Re(im)(CO)3 (phen)]+ , (im: imidazole, bpy: bypiridine, phen: phenantroline). The results revel that TDDFT is robust except when using B3LYP functional for first-row d6 TMCs. In contrast, MS-CASPT2 calculations are strongly biased in those cases with competitive MLCT/MC states. The results reinforce the reliability of B3LYP to describe the excited states in d6 TMCs, but question the validity of assessing the density functional theory (DFT)/TDDFT performance via direct comparison with MS-CASPT2 performed at the same DFT reference geometry as a standard strategy. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a density functional theory 
650 4 |a excited state energies 
650 4 |a transition metal complexes 
650 4 |a wave-function theory 
700 1 |a Fumanal, Maria  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of computational chemistry  |d 1984  |g 40(2019), 27 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 2377-2390  |w (DE-627)NLM098138448  |x 1096-987X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:40  |g year:2019  |g number:27  |g day:15  |g month:10  |g pages:2377-2390 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26014  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 40  |j 2019  |e 27  |b 15  |c 10  |h 2377-2390