Segmentation of Laser Point Clouds in Urban Areas by a Modified Normalized Cut Method
Normalized Cut is a well-established divisive image segmentation method, which we adapt in this paper for the segmentation of laser point clouds in urban areas. Our focus is on polyhedral objects with planar surfaces. Due to its target function, Normalized Cut favours cuts with "short cut lines...
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. - 1979. - 41(2019), 12 vom: 15. Dez., Seite 3034-3047 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence |
| Schlagworte: | Journal Article |
| Zusammenfassung: | Normalized Cut is a well-established divisive image segmentation method, which we adapt in this paper for the segmentation of laser point clouds in urban areas. Our focus is on polyhedral objects with planar surfaces. Due to its target function, Normalized Cut favours cuts with "short cut lines" or "small cut surfaces", which is a drawback for our application. We therefore modify the target function, weighting the similarity measures with distance-dependent weights. We call the induced minimization problem "Distance-weighted Cut" (DWCut). The new target function leads to a generalized eigenvalue problem, which is slightly more complicated than the corresponding problem for the Normalized Cut; on the other hand, the new target function is easier to interpret and avoids some drawbacks of the Normalized Cut. We point out an efficient method for the numerical solution of the eigenvalue problem which is based on a Krylov subspace method. DWCut can be beneficially combined with an aggregation in order to reduce the computational effort and to avoid shortcomings due to insufficient plane parameters. We present examples for the successful application of the Distance-weighted Cut principle and evaluate its results by comparison with the results of corresponding manual segmentations |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Revised 04.03.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1939-3539 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2869744 |