|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM277882079 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231225015321.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3928/23258160-20171030-03
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0926.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM277882079
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)29121357
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Paulus, Yannis M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2017
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 27.11.2017
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 25.02.2020
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.
|
520 |
|
|
|a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
|
520 |
|
|
|a PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients undergoing surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with 46 patients undergoing PR compared with 44 patients undergoing scleral buckle procedure (SBP)
|
520 |
|
|
|a RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Single surgery reattachment rate was 95.5% with SBP and 67% with PR (P = .00057). Final reattachment rate was 100% with SBP and 97.8% with PR. A final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better occurred in 89% of patients with SBP and 72% of patients with PR (P = .04). PR and SBP had a similar mean VA if the primary procedures were successful, whereas those patients with unsuccessful PR had lower mean final acuities
|
520 |
|
|
|a CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SBP has a significantly higher rate of single surgery reattachment than PR, along with improved final VA. Initial success of PR may be an important predictor of final visual outcome. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:887-893.]
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Comparative Study
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Fluorocarbons
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a perfluorooctane
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a 6P60ZBK0QL
|2 NLM
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Leung, Loh-Shan
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Pilyugina, Svetlana
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Blumenkranz, Mark S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
|d 2013
|g 48(2017), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 887-893
|w (DE-627)NLM224956647
|x 2325-8179
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:48
|g year:2017
|g number:11
|g day:01
|g month:11
|g pages:887-893
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20171030-03
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_24
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_31
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_40
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_63
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_69
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_70
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_90
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_91
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_130
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_135
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_136
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_151
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_181
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_203
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_217
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_235
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_289
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_294
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_297
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_352
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_674
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_676
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_688
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_698
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_721
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_737
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_791
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_812
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 48
|j 2017
|e 11
|b 01
|c 11
|h 887-893
|