Comparison of Pneumatic Retinopexy and Scleral Buckle for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair
Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 48(2017), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 887-893 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2017
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina |
Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Fluorocarbons perfluorooctane 6P60ZBK0QL |
Zusammenfassung: | Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients undergoing surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with 46 patients undergoing PR compared with 44 patients undergoing scleral buckle procedure (SBP) RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Single surgery reattachment rate was 95.5% with SBP and 67% with PR (P = .00057). Final reattachment rate was 100% with SBP and 97.8% with PR. A final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better occurred in 89% of patients with SBP and 72% of patients with PR (P = .04). PR and SBP had a similar mean VA if the primary procedures were successful, whereas those patients with unsuccessful PR had lower mean final acuities CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SBP has a significantly higher rate of single surgery reattachment than PR, along with improved final VA. Initial success of PR may be an important predictor of final visual outcome. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:887-893.] |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 27.11.2017 Date Revised 25.02.2020 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 2325-8179 |
DOI: | 10.3928/23258160-20171030-03 |