Analysis of three risk stratification systems in a Saudi population

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Although there are a number of algorithms in use for determining the risk of coronary artery disease and thus predicting future cardiovascular events, the data available regarding their validity among the Saudi population...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association. - 1999. - 29(2017), 2 vom: 21. Apr., Seite 96-101
Auteur principal: Abazid, Rami (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Al Saqqa, Hanna, Smettei, Osama
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2017
Accès à la collection:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Sujets:Journal Article ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equation Framingham Risk Score Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis score
Description
Résumé:INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. Although there are a number of algorithms in use for determining the risk of coronary artery disease and thus predicting future cardiovascular events, the data available regarding their validity among the Saudi population are insufficient
OBJECTIVE: We studied the validity of three clinical score systems in predicting a high risk population defined as having excessive coronary calcification: the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort Risk Equation, the Framingham Risk Score, and the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation
METHODS: We analyzed data from 462 patients aged ⩾40 years. High-risk features were if the Coronary Calcium Score was either >400 or in the ⩾75th percentile using Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) score. The scores for the three algorithms were then calculated using the participants' clinical data
RESULTS: A total of 87 (18.8%) patients were positive for coronary calcification. Among them, 60 (13%) were classified as being at high risk according to the MESA score. Analyzing these patients by the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equation resulted in nine (15%) as being at low risk, 12 (20%) at intermediate risk, and 39 (65%) at high risk. The Framingham Risk classification resulted in 14 (23%) being at low risk, 13 (22%) at intermediate risk, and 33 (55%) at high risk. The European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk classification showed 24 (40%) at low risk, 12 (20%) at intermediate risk, and 24 (40%) at high risk, with p < 0.0001
CONCLUSION: The ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equation has superior risk ​ calibration compared to the other two risk-score algorithms in a Saudi population
Description:Date Revised 30.09.2020
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:1016-7315
DOI:10.1016/j.jsha.2016.06.002