Changes in the chloroplastic CO2 concentration explain much of the observed Kok effect : a model

© 2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 214(2017), 2 vom: 30. Apr., Seite 570-584
1. Verfasser: Farquhar, Graham D (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Busch, Florian A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Kok effect Laisk method biochemical photosynthesis model chloroplastic CO2 concentration day respiration fitting tool irradiance mitochondrial respiration Carbon Dioxide mehr... 142M471B3J Oxygen S88TT14065
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust.
Mitochondrial respiration often appears to be inhibited in the light when compared with measurements in the dark. This inhibition is inferred from the response of the net CO2 assimilation rate (A) to absorbed irradiance (I), changing slope around the light compensation point (Ic ). We suggest a model that provides a plausible mechanistic explanation of this 'Kok effect'. The model uses the mathematical description of photosynthesis developed by Farquhar, von Caemmerer and Berry; it involves no inhibition of respiration rate in the light. We also describe a fitting technique for quantifying the Kok effect at low I. Changes in the chloroplastic CO2 partial pressure (Cc ) can explain curvature of A vs I, its diminution in C4 plants and at low oxygen concentrations or high carbon dioxide concentrations in C3 plants, and effects of dark respiration rate and of temperature. It also explains the apparent inhibition of respiration in the light as inferred by the Laisk approach. While there are probably other sources of curvature in A vs I, variation in Cc can largely explain the curvature at low irradiance, and suggests that interpretation of day respiration compared with dark respiration of leaves on the basis of the Kok effect needs reassessment
Beschreibung:Date Completed 22.02.2018
Date Revised 30.09.2020
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1469-8137
DOI:10.1111/nph.14512