Cost comparison of intravitreal aflibercept with bevacizumab and ranibizumab for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration

Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 46(2015), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 62-6
1. Verfasser: Shaikh, Adeel H (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Toussaint, Brian W, Miller, Daniel M, Petersen, Michael R, Foster, Robert E, Riemann, Christopher D, Hutchins, Robert K, Sisk, Robert A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Angiogenesis Inhibitors Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Recombinant Fusion Proteins VEGFA protein, human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A aflibercept 15C2VL427D Bevacizumab mehr... 2S9ZZM9Q9V Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor EC 2.7.10.1 Ranibizumab ZL1R02VT79
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM245064591
003 DE-627
005 20231224140045.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3928/23258160-20150101-10  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0816.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM245064591 
035 |a (NLM)25559511 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Shaikh, Adeel H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Cost comparison of intravitreal aflibercept with bevacizumab and ranibizumab for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 18.06.2015 
500 |a Date Revised 08.04.2022 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated. 
520 |a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that although intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) is expected to be more expensive, the extra cost of treatment would not result in additional vision gain compared with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) 
520 |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving IVB or intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) who were subsequently changed to IVA for active wet AMD 
520 |a RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes were included in the study. The mean number of IVB, IVR, and IVA injections per eye over a 6-month period was seven, six, and five, respectively. Visual outcomes were similar in all three groups at the end of the study period. The average drug cost of IVB, IVR, and IVA injections per eye over 6 months was $326, $11,400, and $9,720, respectively 
520 |a CONCLUSION: Aflibercept may allow a modest extension of the treatment interval, but cost makes IVA an expensive alternative without a visual benefit compared with IVB in patients with active wet AMD 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 7 |a Angiogenesis Inhibitors  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Recombinant Fusion Proteins  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a VEGFA protein, human  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a aflibercept  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 15C2VL427D  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Bevacizumab  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 2S9ZZM9Q9V  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a EC 2.7.10.1  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Ranibizumab  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a ZL1R02VT79  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Toussaint, Brian W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Miller, Daniel M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Petersen, Michael R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Foster, Robert E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Riemann, Christopher D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hutchins, Robert K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sisk, Robert A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina  |d 2013  |g 46(2015), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 62-6  |w (DE-627)NLM224956647  |x 2325-8179  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g day:15  |g month:01  |g pages:62-6 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20150101-10  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_91 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_135 
912 |a GBV_ILN_136 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_181 
912 |a GBV_ILN_203 
912 |a GBV_ILN_217 
912 |a GBV_ILN_235 
912 |a GBV_ILN_289 
912 |a GBV_ILN_294 
912 |a GBV_ILN_297 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_352 
912 |a GBV_ILN_674 
912 |a GBV_ILN_676 
912 |a GBV_ILN_688 
912 |a GBV_ILN_698 
912 |a GBV_ILN_721 
912 |a GBV_ILN_737 
912 |a GBV_ILN_791 
912 |a GBV_ILN_812 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 46  |j 2015  |e 1  |b 15  |c 01  |h 62-6