Cost comparison of intravitreal aflibercept with bevacizumab and ranibizumab for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration
Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 46(2015), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 62-6 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2015
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina |
Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Angiogenesis Inhibitors Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized Recombinant Fusion Proteins VEGFA protein, human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A aflibercept 15C2VL427D Bevacizumab mehr... |
Zusammenfassung: | Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that although intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) is expected to be more expensive, the extra cost of treatment would not result in additional vision gain compared with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) for the treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving IVB or intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) who were subsequently changed to IVA for active wet AMD RESULTS: Thirty-three eyes were included in the study. The mean number of IVB, IVR, and IVA injections per eye over a 6-month period was seven, six, and five, respectively. Visual outcomes were similar in all three groups at the end of the study period. The average drug cost of IVB, IVR, and IVA injections per eye over 6 months was $326, $11,400, and $9,720, respectively CONCLUSION: Aflibercept may allow a modest extension of the treatment interval, but cost makes IVA an expensive alternative without a visual benefit compared with IVB in patients with active wet AMD |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 18.06.2015 Date Revised 08.04.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 2325-8179 |
DOI: | 10.3928/23258160-20150101-10 |