Comparison of gel column agglutination with monoclonal antibodies and card agglutination methods for assessing the feline AB group system and a frequency study of feline blood types in northern Italy

©2011 American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary clinical pathology. - 1975. - 40(2011), 1 vom: 15. März, Seite 32-9
1. Verfasser: Proverbio, Daniela (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Spada, Eva, Baggiani, Luciana, Perego, Roberta, Milici, Alessandra, Ferro, Elisabetta
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2011
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Veterinary clinical pathology
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Antibodies, Monoclonal Blood Group Antigens
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:©2011 American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.
BACKGROUND: A new commercial gel column agglutination system is reported to have high sensitivity in detecting cats with blood type AB
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare gel column agglutination and card agglutination methods for feline blood-typing and to determine the frequency distribution of feline blood types in northern Italy
METHODS: Blood-typing was performed on 120 cats using both a commercial gel column containing monoclonal antibodies (ID Gel-Test Micro Typing System) and a card agglutination method (RapidVet-H Feline). Results were confirmed with back-typing. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the 2 methods. A second group of 140 Domestic Shorthair (DSH) cats was blood-typed using the gel column technique to determine the frequency distribution of feline blood types in northern Italy
RESULTS: The card agglutination method demonstrated poor sensitivity in identification of type-AB cats (61%) and was only 95% specific when identifying type-B cats. The gel column agglutination technique demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for typing all 3 blood types (A, B, and AB). The frequency distribution study of 140 cats demonstrated that 127 (90.7%) cats were type A, 10 (7.1%) were type B, and 3 (2.1%) were type AB
CONCLUSION: When blood-typing cats of breeds with a relatively high frequency of blood types B and AB, methods that use monoclonal antibodies for detection of blood types B and AB are recommended. Alternatively, blood type can be confirmed by more sensitive supplemental testing, such as back-typing. The high frequency of blood type A in DSH cats in northern Italy was comparable to previously reported frequencies in Italy and world-wide
Beschreibung:Date Completed 07.07.2011
Date Revised 09.04.2022
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1939-165X
DOI:10.1111/j.1939-165X.2011.00286.x