COMPARED TO WHAT? VARIATION IN THE IMPACTS OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION BY ALTERNATIVE CARE TYPE

Early childhood education research often compares a group of children who receive the intervention of interest to a group of children who receive care in a range of different care settings. In this paper, we estimate differential impacts of an early childhood intervention by alternative care type, u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of Applied Statistics. - Institute of Mathematical Statistics. - 10(2016), 3, Seite 1245-1285
1. Verfasser: Feller, Avi (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Grindal, Todd, Miratrix, Luke, Page, Lindsay C.
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The Annals of Applied Statistics
Schlagworte:Behavioral sciences Education Social sciences Health sciences Mathematics Economics
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Early childhood education research often compares a group of children who receive the intervention of interest to a group of children who receive care in a range of different care settings. In this paper, we estimate differential impacts of an early childhood intervention by alternative care type, using data from the Head Start Impact Study, a large-scale randomized evaluation. To do so, we utilize a Bayesian principal stratification framework to estimate separate impacts for two types of Compilers: those children who would otherwise be in other center-based care when assigned to control and those who would otherwise be in home-based care. We find strong, positive short-term effects of Head Start on receptive vocabulary for those Compilers who would otherwise be in home-based care. By contrast, we find no meaningful impact of Head Start on vocabulary for those Compilers who would otherwise be in other center-based care. Our findings suggest that alternative care type is a potentially important source of variation in early childhood education interventions.
ISSN:19326157