When Not All Conflict Is Bad: Manufacturing-Marketing Conflict and Strategic Incentive Design

Researchers and managers broadly agree that coordination and harmony between manufacturing and marketing improve firm performance by eliminating suboptimal practices within the firm. In this paper, we present a contrasting view of the manufacturing-marketing interface. We model a duopoly in which th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management Science. - Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954. - 50(2004), 4, Seite 489-502
1. Verfasser: Balasubramanian, Sridhar (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Bhardwaj, Pradeep
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2004
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Management Science
Schlagworte:Manufacturing-marketing conflict Manufacturing-marketing coordination Marketing strategy Pricing strategy Product quality Strategic incentive design Game theory Mathematics Business Applied sciences Economics
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST056257295
003 DE-627
005 20240622021638.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 150324s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST056257295 
035 |a (JST)30046088 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Balasubramanian, Sridhar  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a When Not All Conflict Is Bad: Manufacturing-Marketing Conflict and Strategic Incentive Design 
264 1 |c 2004 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Researchers and managers broadly agree that coordination and harmony between manufacturing and marketing improve firm performance by eliminating suboptimal practices within the firm. In this paper, we present a contrasting view of the manufacturing-marketing interface. We model a duopoly in which the firms compete on price and quality dimensions. The manufacturing and marketing managers within each firm are presented with conflicting incentives focused on cost minimization and revenue maximization, respectively. These managers bargain with each other before arriving at compromise decisions regarding price and quality. While frequently encountered in practice, this "conflicting-objectives puzzle" is surprising because one expects that centralized coordination by the owners of the firm towards profit maximization would lead to higher profits. In this paper, we resolve the conflicting-objectives puzzle and demonstrate that, surprisingly, the firm's resulting profits in this setting of conflict can be higher than those obtained when the decisions of the managers are perfectly coordinated. We also analyze the equilibrium in incentive plans when the owners can choose between compromise and perfect coordination. Our results offer a new interpretation of manufacturing-marketing conflict as a strategic tool that can enhance firm profits. 
540 |a Copyright 2004 INFORMS 
650 4 |a Manufacturing-marketing conflict 
650 4 |a Manufacturing-marketing coordination 
650 4 |a Marketing strategy 
650 4 |a Pricing strategy 
650 4 |a Product quality 
650 4 |a Strategic incentive design 
650 4 |a Game theory 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Game theory  |x Nash equilibrium 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Corporate communications  |x External corporate communications  |x Marketing 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Corporate communications  |x External corporate communications  |x Marketing  |x Marketing management 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Engineering  |x Industrial engineering  |x Industrial design 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Management science 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Microeconomics  |x Economic costs and benefits  |x Economic costs  |x Marginal costs 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Financial economics  |x Finance  |x Financial management 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business operations  |x Commerce  |x Pricing  |x Prices  |x Market prices 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Human resources  |x Employee motivation  |x Productivity incentives  |x Incentive plans 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Macroeconomics  |x Aggregate economy  |x Market economics  |x Market equilibrium  |x Equilibrium prices 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Game theory  |x Nash equilibrium 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Corporate communications  |x External corporate communications  |x Marketing 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Corporate communications  |x External corporate communications  |x Marketing  |x Marketing management 
650 4 |a Applied sciences  |x Engineering  |x Industrial engineering  |x Industrial design 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Applied mathematics  |x Management science 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Microeconomics  |x Economic costs and benefits  |x Economic costs  |x Marginal costs 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Financial economics  |x Finance  |x Financial management 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business operations  |x Commerce  |x Pricing  |x Prices  |x Market prices 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Human resources  |x Employee motivation  |x Productivity incentives  |x Incentive plans 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Macroeconomics  |x Aggregate economy  |x Market economics  |x Market equilibrium  |x Equilibrium prices 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Bhardwaj, Pradeep  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Management Science  |d Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 1954  |g 50(2004), 4, Seite 489-502  |w (DE-627)320623602  |w (DE-600)2023019-9  |x 15265501  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2004  |g number:4  |g pages:489-502 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/30046088  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2065 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2106 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2153 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2232 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2472 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2935 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2940 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 50  |j 2004  |e 4  |h 489-502