Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two ground beetle taxa, <ce:italic>Carabus</ce:italic> (<ce:italic>Procrustes</ce:italic>) <ce:italic>coriaceus cerisyi</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>C</ce:italic>. (<ce:italic>Morphocarabus</ce:italic>) <ce:italic>kollari praecellens</ce:italic> (Coleoptera: Carabidae) - A geometric morphometric approach

We investigated morphometric variation in size and shape of the head, pronotum, and abdomen between the taxa and sexes of two ground beetles, Carabus coriaceus cerisyi Dejean, 1826 and C. kollari praecellens Palliardi, 1825. These two taxa differ in overall size, and both of them are characterized b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT. - 2011. - Amsterdam [u.a.]
1. Verfasser: Vesović, Nikola (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Ivanović, Ana (BerichterstatterIn), Ćurčić, Srećko (BerichterstatterIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019transfer abstract
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT
Schlagworte:Geometric morphometrics Shape Size <ce:italic>Carabus</ce:italic> Sexual dimorphism Allometry
Umfang:9
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 ELV046376178
003 DE-627
005 20230626013608.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191021s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.asd.2019.01.004  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a GBV00000000000578.pica 
035 |a (DE-627)ELV046376178 
035 |a (ELSEVIER)S1467-8039(18)30135-X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 610  |q VZ 
082 0 4 |a 670  |q VZ 
084 |a 51.75  |2 bkl 
100 1 |a Vesović, Nikola  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two ground beetle taxa, <ce:italic>Carabus</ce:italic> (<ce:italic>Procrustes</ce:italic>) <ce:italic>coriaceus cerisyi</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>C</ce:italic>. (<ce:italic>Morphocarabus</ce:italic>) <ce:italic>kollari praecellens</ce:italic> (Coleoptera: Carabidae) - A geometric morphometric approach 
264 1 |c 2019transfer abstract 
300 |a 9 
336 |a nicht spezifiziert  |b zzz  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a nicht spezifiziert  |b z  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a nicht spezifiziert  |b zu  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We investigated morphometric variation in size and shape of the head, pronotum, and abdomen between the taxa and sexes of two ground beetles, Carabus coriaceus cerisyi Dejean, 1826 and C. kollari praecellens Palliardi, 1825. These two taxa differ in overall size, and both of them are characterized by significant sexual size dimorphism. In many taxa, allometry, the relationship between changes in shape and changes in size, can be a major component of intra- and interspecific variation in body shape. In the present study, we applied landmark-based geometric morphometrics to explore allometric and non-allometric components of shape variation between the taxa and more importantly between sexes within the taxa. We were able to show that the differences of shape between the taxa cannot be explained by allometric changes, as allometry explains only a small amount of total shape variation between the taxa, which was expected due to the fact that the taxa belong to separate subgenera. Between the sexes, on the other hand, allometry contributes largely to the variation, particularly in abdomen shape. However, the differences of head and pronotum shape between the sexes cannot be entirely explained in terms of allometric scaling. Our results indicate that allometry contributes largely to differences of body shape between the sexes, while differences between the taxa are influenced by other factors and processes. 
520 |a We investigated morphometric variation in size and shape of the head, pronotum, and abdomen between the taxa and sexes of two ground beetles, Carabus coriaceus cerisyi Dejean, 1826 and C. kollari praecellens Palliardi, 1825. These two taxa differ in overall size, and both of them are characterized by significant sexual size dimorphism. In many taxa, allometry, the relationship between changes in shape and changes in size, can be a major component of intra- and interspecific variation in body shape. In the present study, we applied landmark-based geometric morphometrics to explore allometric and non-allometric components of shape variation between the taxa and more importantly between sexes within the taxa. We were able to show that the differences of shape between the taxa cannot be explained by allometric changes, as allometry explains only a small amount of total shape variation between the taxa, which was expected due to the fact that the taxa belong to separate subgenera. Between the sexes, on the other hand, allometry contributes largely to the variation, particularly in abdomen shape. However, the differences of head and pronotum shape between the sexes cannot be entirely explained in terms of allometric scaling. Our results indicate that allometry contributes largely to differences of body shape between the sexes, while differences between the taxa are influenced by other factors and processes. 
650 7 |a Geometric morphometrics  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Shape  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Size  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a <ce:italic>Carabus</ce:italic>  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Sexual dimorphism  |2 Elsevier 
650 7 |a Allometry  |2 Elsevier 
700 1 |a Ivanović, Ana  |4 oth 
700 1 |a Ćurčić, Srećko  |4 oth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |n Elsevier Science  |t Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT  |d 2011  |g Amsterdam [u.a.]  |w (DE-627)ELV015921530 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2019  |g pages:1-9  |g extent:9 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2019.01.004  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_U 
912 |a GBV_ELV 
912 |a SYSFLAG_U 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_26 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_49 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_131 
912 |a GBV_ILN_179 
912 |a GBV_ILN_227 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_618 
912 |a GBV_ILN_694 
912 |a GBV_ILN_697 
912 |a GBV_ILN_807 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2019 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2023 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2124 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2156 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2208 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2469 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2505 
936 b k |a 51.75  |j Verbundwerkstoffe  |j Schichtstoffe  |q VZ 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 49  |j 2019  |h 1-9  |g 9