Sexual size and shape dimorphism in two ground beetle taxa, <ce:italic>Carabus</ce:italic> (<ce:italic>Procrustes</ce:italic>) <ce:italic>coriaceus cerisyi</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>C</ce:italic>. (<ce:italic>Morphocarabus</ce:italic>) <ce:italic>kollari praecellens</ce:italic> (Coleoptera: Carabidae) - A geometric morphometric approach

We investigated morphometric variation in size and shape of the head, pronotum, and abdomen between the taxa and sexes of two ground beetles, Carabus coriaceus cerisyi Dejean, 1826 and C. kollari praecellens Palliardi, 1825. These two taxa differ in overall size, and both of them are characterized b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT. - 2011. - Amsterdam [u.a.]
1. Verfasser: Vesović, Nikola (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Ivanović, Ana (BerichterstatterIn), Ćurčić, Srećko (BerichterstatterIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019transfer abstract
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ventricular Restraint Improves Outcomes in HF Patients with CRT
Schlagworte:Geometric morphometrics Shape Size <ce:italic>Carabus</ce:italic> Sexual dimorphism Allometry
Umfang:9
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We investigated morphometric variation in size and shape of the head, pronotum, and abdomen between the taxa and sexes of two ground beetles, Carabus coriaceus cerisyi Dejean, 1826 and C. kollari praecellens Palliardi, 1825. These two taxa differ in overall size, and both of them are characterized by significant sexual size dimorphism. In many taxa, allometry, the relationship between changes in shape and changes in size, can be a major component of intra- and interspecific variation in body shape. In the present study, we applied landmark-based geometric morphometrics to explore allometric and non-allometric components of shape variation between the taxa and more importantly between sexes within the taxa. We were able to show that the differences of shape between the taxa cannot be explained by allometric changes, as allometry explains only a small amount of total shape variation between the taxa, which was expected due to the fact that the taxa belong to separate subgenera. Between the sexes, on the other hand, allometry contributes largely to the variation, particularly in abdomen shape. However, the differences of head and pronotum shape between the sexes cannot be entirely explained in terms of allometric scaling. Our results indicate that allometry contributes largely to differences of body shape between the sexes, while differences between the taxa are influenced by other factors and processes.
We investigated morphometric variation in size and shape of the head, pronotum, and abdomen between the taxa and sexes of two ground beetles, Carabus coriaceus cerisyi Dejean, 1826 and C. kollari praecellens Palliardi, 1825. These two taxa differ in overall size, and both of them are characterized by significant sexual size dimorphism. In many taxa, allometry, the relationship between changes in shape and changes in size, can be a major component of intra- and interspecific variation in body shape. In the present study, we applied landmark-based geometric morphometrics to explore allometric and non-allometric components of shape variation between the taxa and more importantly between sexes within the taxa. We were able to show that the differences of shape between the taxa cannot be explained by allometric changes, as allometry explains only a small amount of total shape variation between the taxa, which was expected due to the fact that the taxa belong to separate subgenera. Between the sexes, on the other hand, allometry contributes largely to the variation, particularly in abdomen shape. However, the differences of head and pronotum shape between the sexes cannot be entirely explained in terms of allometric scaling. Our results indicate that allometry contributes largely to differences of body shape between the sexes, while differences between the taxa are influenced by other factors and processes.
Beschreibung:9
DOI:10.1016/j.asd.2019.01.004