„Keine Herrschaft dem Lasterhaften!“

Abstract The period between after the death of an-Nāṣir Muḥammad b. Qalāwūn in 1341 and the rise of the first Circassian Sultan in 1382 was characterized by the emirs’ struggle for domination in the Mamluk Empire. This led to a rapid succession of twelve puppet sultans, each of which was installed o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Das Mittelalter. - De Gruyter Akademie Forschung, 1996. - 20(2015), 1 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 160-176
1. Verfasser: Gharaibeh, Mohammad (VerfasserIn)
Format: Aufsatz
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Das Mittelalter
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 OLC2136556509
003 DE-627
005 20230810073603.0
007 tu
008 230810s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||und c
024 7 |a 10.1515/mial-2015-0010  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)OLC2136556509 
035 |a (DE-B1597)mial-2015-0010-p 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
082 0 4 |a 940  |q VZ 
082 0 4 |a 940  |q VZ 
084 |a 8,1  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gharaibeh, Mohammad  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a „Keine Herrschaft dem Lasterhaften!“ 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a © 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston 
520 |a Abstract The period between after the death of an-Nāṣir Muḥammad b. Qalāwūn in 1341 and the rise of the first Circassian Sultan in 1382 was characterized by the emirs’ struggle for domination in the Mamluk Empire. This led to a rapid succession of twelve puppet sultans, each of which was installed only to be removed shortly after his enthronement and to be replaced by another one. This paper investigates the narrative strategies to deal with these circumstances in the chronicle of the historian Ibn Kaṯīr ‘al-Bidāya wa-n-nihāya‘. In his account on the remarkable succession of sultans, he explains their political failure as a result of their immoral way of life. The paper will hence show how Ibn Kaṯīr uses a religious narrative to overcome the contingency of the unstable political period. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Das Mittelalter  |d De Gruyter Akademie Forschung, 1996  |g 20(2015), 1 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 160-176  |w (DE-627)216862167  |w (DE-600)1341574-8  |w (DE-576)055946283  |x 0949-0345  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g day:01  |g month:06  |g pages:160-176 
856 4 1 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/mial-2015-0010  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_OLC 
912 |a SSG-OPC-ANG 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_121 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_179 
912 |a GBV_ILN_181 
912 |a GBV_ILN_227 
912 |a GBV_ILN_267 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_698 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2002 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2004 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2453 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2505 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4082 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4155 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4253 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4277 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4302 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4310 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4311 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4316 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4318 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4319 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4320 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4392 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 20  |j 2015  |e 1  |b 01  |c 06  |h 160-176