|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM377671819 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240917234104.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
240916s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.04.015
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1536.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM377671819
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)39280153
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Agarwalla, Avinesh
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Identifying clinically meaningful subgroups following open reduction and internal fixation for proximal humerus fractures
|b a risk stratification analysis for mortality and 30-day complications using machine learning
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2024
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 17.09.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Electronic-eCollection
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2024 The Author(s).
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Background: Identification of prognostic variables for poor outcomes following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced proximal humerus fractures have been limited to singular, linear factors and subjective clinical intuition. Machine learning (ML) has the capability to objectively segregate patients based on various outcome metrics and reports the connectivity of variables resulting in the optimal outcome. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) use unsupervised ML to stratify patients to high-risk and low-risk clusters based on postoperative events, (2) compare the ML clusters to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification for assessment of risk, and (3) determine the variables that were associated with high-risk patients after proximal humerus ORIF
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fractures between 2005 and 2018. Four unsupervised ML clustering algorithms were evaluated to partition subjects into "high-risk" and "low-risk" subgroups based on combinations of observed outcomes. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were compared between these groups using descriptive statistics. A supervised ML algorithm was generated to identify patients who were likely to be "high risk" and were compared to ASA classification. A game-theory-based explanation algorithm was used to illustrate predictors of "high-risk" status
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Results: Overall, 4670 patients were included, of which 202 were partitioned into the "high-risk" cluster, while the remaining (4468 patients) were partitioned into the "low-risk" cluster. Patients in the "high-risk" cluster demonstrated significantly increased rates of the following complications: 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission rates, 30-day reoperation rates, nonroutine discharge rates, length of stay, and rates of all surgical and medical complications assessed with the exception of urinary tract infection (P < .001). The best performing supervised machine learning algorithm for preoperatively identifying "high-risk" patients was the extreme-gradient boost (XGBoost), which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 76.8%, while ASA classification had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 61.7%. Shapley values identified the following predictors of "high-risk" status: greater body mass index, increasing age, ASA class 3, increased operative time, male gender, diabetes, and smoking history
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Conclusion: Unsupervised ML identified that "high-risk" patients have a higher risk of complications (8.9%) than "low-risk" groups (0.4%) with respect to 30-day complication rate. A supervised ML model selected greater body mass index, increasing age, ASA class 3, increased operative time, male gender, diabetes, and smoking history to effectively predict "high-risk" patients
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Complications
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Machine learning
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Open reduction internal fixation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Proximal humerus fracture
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Readmission
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Reoperation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Risk factors
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Risk stratification
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lu, Yining
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Reinholz, Anna K
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Marigi, Erick M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Liu, Joseph N
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Sanchez-Sotelo, Joaquin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t JSES international
|d 2020
|g 8(2024), 5 vom: 28. Sept., Seite 932-940
|w (DE-627)NLM307818438
|x 2666-6383
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:8
|g year:2024
|g number:5
|g day:28
|g month:09
|g pages:932-940
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.04.015
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_50
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 8
|j 2024
|e 5
|b 28
|c 09
|h 932-940
|