The Copenhagen Classification System for Distal Humeral Fractures is useful to identify patients who may require treatment with hemi- or total elbow arthroplasty

© 2024 The Author(s).

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 8(2024), 4 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 915-920
1. Verfasser: Al-Hamdani, Ali (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rasmussen, Jeppe V, Al-Hamdani, Mustafa A, Sørensen, Anne Kathrine B, Eschen, Jacob, Olsen, Bo S
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article Classification Copenhagen Distal humerus Elbow Elbow arthroplasty Elbow hemiarthroplasty Fractures ORIF
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM375232818
003 DE-627
005 20240723233637.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240722s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.016  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1479.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM375232818 
035 |a (NLM)39035674 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Al-Hamdani, Ali  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Copenhagen Classification System for Distal Humeral Fractures is useful to identify patients who may require treatment with hemi- or total elbow arthroplasty 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 23.07.2024 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2024 The Author(s). 
520 |a Background: Classification systems are only useful if there is agreement among observers. The purpose of this study is to introduce a simple and clinically applicable classification system - The Copenhagen Classification System for Distal Humeral Fractures (CCDHF) and to compare the interobserver and intraobserver agreement for this classification with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA), and the Sheffield classification systems. The primary objective of the new classification system is to distinguish fractures that may not be suitable for open reduction and internal fixation, necessitating treatment options such as elbow hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) 
520 |a Methods: Five consultant elbow surgeons assessed a consecutive series of 105 sets X-rays of distal humeral fractures on 2 occasions with at least 10 weeks interval. All X-rays were classified according to AO/OTA, Sheffield, and the CCDHF systems. The CCDHF system has been developed collaboratively by a panel of five experienced elbow surgeons. Based on consensus, the surgeons identified specific fracture characteristics where elbow hemiarthroplasty or TEA might be needed 
520 |a Results: The mean interobserver agreement was fair for AO/OTA and moderate for Sheffield and the CCDHF. The mean intraobserver agreement was moderate for AO/OTA and substantial for Sheffield and the CCDHF. The observers were uncertain about the classification in 29% of the cases with the AO/OTA classification, 15% with the Sheffield classification, and 12% with CCDHF 
520 |a Conclusion: The CCDHF demonstrated validity and clinical applicability and can assist surgeons in identifying fractures that may require hemiarthroplasty or TEA treatment 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Classification 
650 4 |a Copenhagen 
650 4 |a Distal humerus 
650 4 |a Elbow 
650 4 |a Elbow arthroplasty 
650 4 |a Elbow hemiarthroplasty 
650 4 |a Fractures 
650 4 |a ORIF 
700 1 |a Rasmussen, Jeppe V  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Al-Hamdani, Mustafa A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sørensen, Anne Kathrine B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Eschen, Jacob  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Olsen, Bo S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JSES international  |d 2020  |g 8(2024), 4 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 915-920  |w (DE-627)NLM307818438  |x 2666-6383  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2024  |g number:4  |g day:04  |g month:07  |g pages:915-920 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.016  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 8  |j 2024  |e 4  |b 04  |c 07  |h 915-920