Ultrasound-guided vs. Standard Coronary Access in Coronary Angiography : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

© 2024 Saudi Heart Association.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association. - 1999. - 36(2024), 2 vom: 09., Seite 111-118
1. Verfasser: Omer, Ibrahim (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Bukhari, Mohammed, Alsharif, Mohammad, Alsamadani, Abdulrahman, Alahmadi, Dinah, Alsudais, Ali S, Abdulkareem, Abdullah, Alamir, Hashem A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Schlagworte:Journal Article Review Cardiac catheterization Coronary angiography Ultrasound
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2024 Saudi Heart Association.
Objectives: Coronary angiography is a procedure performed during cardiac catheterization to define the coronary anatomy and determine the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). The use of a cheap, relatively available tool like an ultrasound machine to assist in vascular access might reduce the risks associated with blind access. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and associated complications of ultrasound-guided coronary artery catheterization
Methods: This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022365518). A systematic search was performed for all published studies without language or country restrictions and all study variables were extracted into prefilled sheets by two independent reviewers
Results: This meta-analysis identified 10 RCTs. The results confirmed statistically significantly reductions of total complications (RR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.72, P < .001), and hematoma >5 cm formation (RR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.75, P = 0.003) in patients who underwent ultrasound-guided coronary artery catheterization
Conclusion: Ultrasound with catheterization, as opposed to landmark-based catheterization, significantly improved the peri-catheterization operative outcomes, providing evidence for further research to be conducted and consideration for its implementation within the medical setting
Beschreibung:Date Revised 17.07.2024
published: Electronic-eCollection
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:1016-7315
DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1383