Do electrostatic interactions make a difference in physics-based AutoDock4 scoring function?

© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational chemistry. - 1984. - 45(2024), 21 vom: 05. Juli, Seite 1806-1820
1. Verfasser: Shaimardanov, Arslan R (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Shulga, Dmitry A, Palyulin, Vladimir A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of computational chemistry
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM371501210
003 DE-627
005 20240721232236.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240426s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1002/jcc.27373  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1477.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM371501210 
035 |a (NLM)38661234 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Shaimardanov, Arslan R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Do electrostatic interactions make a difference in physics-based AutoDock4 scoring function? 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 20.07.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. 
520 |a Physics-based scoring function AutoDock4 is one of the most successfully applied tools in the area of structure-based drug design. However, current scoring functions are still far from being perfect. In a recent work highlighting the strengths and deficiencies of current scoring functions, we discovered that the residual error of ΔGbind predictions made by AutoDock4 is highly correlated to the presence of formally charged fragments in a ligand. In this work, we study how the use of the high-quality atomic charges, applied for contemporary force fields calculation, affects the quality of the experimental ΔGbind prediction by means of AutoDock4. We initially expected that the previously found discrepancy could be attributed to the Gasteiger charges used within AutoDock4. We show that AutoDock4 is, surprisingly, not sensitive to the charges used, and the use of QC-derived atomic charges does not lead to any statistical improvements. We also briefly discuss the role of the explicit empirical hydrogen bond term along with the electrostatic term 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Shulga, Dmitry A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Palyulin, Vladimir A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of computational chemistry  |d 1984  |g 45(2024), 21 vom: 05. Juli, Seite 1806-1820  |w (DE-627)NLM098138448  |x 1096-987X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2024  |g number:21  |g day:05  |g month:07  |g pages:1806-1820 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.27373  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 45  |j 2024  |e 21  |b 05  |c 07  |h 1806-1820