Comparing Three-Dimensional Digitally Enabled Intraoperative OCT With Conventional Microscope-Integrated OCT in Vitreoretinal Surgery : A Post Hoc Analysis of the DISCOVER Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the surgeon experience between conventional microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) and digitally enabled microscope-integrated iOCT in vitreoretinal surgery

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 55(2024), 5 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 270-277
1. Verfasser: Talcott, Katherine E (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Knapp, Austen N, Amine, Reem, Matar, Karen, Srivastava, Sunil K, Rachitskaya, Aleksandra, Sharma, Sumit, Singh, Rishi P, Yuan, Alex, Reese, Jamie L, Ehlers, Justis P
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
Schlagworte:Journal Article Comparative Study
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM371373603
003 DE-627
005 20240910232627.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240424s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3928/23258160-20240206-01  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1529.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM371373603 
035 |a (NLM)38648428 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Talcott, Katherine E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparing Three-Dimensional Digitally Enabled Intraoperative OCT With Conventional Microscope-Integrated OCT in Vitreoretinal Surgery  |b A Post Hoc Analysis of the DISCOVER Study 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 16.05.2024 
500 |a Date Revised 10.09.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study compared the surgeon experience between conventional microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) and digitally enabled microscope-integrated iOCT in vitreoretinal surgery 
520 |a PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a post hoc case-control analysis of the DISCOVER study. Conventional microscope-integrated iOCT (Rescan 700, Zeiss) was compared with digitally enabled iOCT (Artevo 800, Zeiss). Compared variables included surgical field-based visualization (ie, ocular heads-up display in the conventional group; three-dimensional screen-based visualization in the digital iOCT group) and non-surgical field-based visualization (ie, review on the external two-dimensional monitor) 
520 |a RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included. Surgical field-based visualization of iOCT was significantly higher in the digitally enabled group (P < 0.0001). Required endoillumination level was significantly lower in the digital iOCT group (P < 0.0001). Surgeons reported "significant" back discomfort and headache more frequently when using conventional iOCT (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively) 
520 |a CONCLUSIONS: Digitally enabled iOCT resulted in greater surgical visualization efficiency, appeared to require a lower illumination level, and may provide advantages for ergonomic-related discomfort. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:270-277.] 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
700 1 |a Knapp, Austen N  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Amine, Reem  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Matar, Karen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Srivastava, Sunil K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rachitskaya, Aleksandra  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sharma, Sumit  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Singh, Rishi P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Yuan, Alex  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reese, Jamie L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ehlers, Justis P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina  |d 2013  |g 55(2024), 5 vom: 12. Mai, Seite 270-277  |w (DE-627)NLM224956647  |x 2325-8179  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:2024  |g number:5  |g day:12  |g month:05  |g pages:270-277 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240206-01  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_91 
912 |a GBV_ILN_130 
912 |a GBV_ILN_135 
912 |a GBV_ILN_136 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_181 
912 |a GBV_ILN_203 
912 |a GBV_ILN_217 
912 |a GBV_ILN_235 
912 |a GBV_ILN_289 
912 |a GBV_ILN_294 
912 |a GBV_ILN_297 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_352 
912 |a GBV_ILN_674 
912 |a GBV_ILN_676 
912 |a GBV_ILN_688 
912 |a GBV_ILN_698 
912 |a GBV_ILN_721 
912 |a GBV_ILN_737 
912 |a GBV_ILN_791 
912 |a GBV_ILN_812 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 55  |j 2024  |e 5  |b 12  |c 05  |h 270-277