Global mismatches between threat mapping research effort and the potential of threat abatement actions to reduce extinction risk

© 2024 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 38(2024), 4 vom: 15. Juli, Seite e14271
1. Verfasser: Ridley, Francesca A (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rushton, Stephen P, Hickinbotham, Emily J, Suggitt, Andrew J, McGowan, Philip J K, Mair, Louise
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Anthropocene Antropoceno abatimiento de amenazas biodiversity conservation conservación de la biodiversidad evidence synthesis selection bias sesgo de selección síntesis de pruebas threat abatement
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM371129958
003 DE-627
005 20240723232959.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240416s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.14271  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1479.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM371129958 
035 |a (NLM)38623873 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ridley, Francesca A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Global mismatches between threat mapping research effort and the potential of threat abatement actions to reduce extinction risk 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 23.07.2024 
500 |a Date Revised 23.07.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2024 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Threat mapping is a necessary tool for identifying and abating direct threats to species in the ongoing extinction crisis. There are known gaps in the threat mapping literature for particular threats and geographic locations, and it remains unclear if the distribution of research effort is appropriately targeted relative to conservation need. We aimed to determine the drivers of threat mapping research effort and to quantify gaps that, if filled, could inform actions with the highest potential to reduce species' extinction risk. We used a negative binomial generalized linear model to analyze research effort as a function of threat abatement potential (quantified as the potential reduction in species extinction risk from abating threats), species richness, land area, and human pressure. The model showed that threat mapping research effort increased by 1.1 to 1.2 times per standardized unit change in threat abatement potential. However, species richness and land area were stronger predictors of research effort overall. The greatest areas of mismatch between research effort and threat abatement potential, receiving disproportionately low research effort, were related to the threats to species of agriculture, aquaculture, and biological resource use across the tropical regions of the Americas, Asia, and Madagascar. Conversely, the threat of linear infrastructure (e.g., roads and rails) across regions, the threat of biological resource use (e.g., hunting or collection) in sub-Saharan Africa, and overall threats in North America and Europe all received disproportionately high research effort. We discuss the range of methodological and sociopolitical factors that may be behind the overall trends and specific areas of mismatch we found. We urge a stronger emphasis on targeting research effort toward those threats and geographic locations where threat abatement activities could make the greatest contribution to reducing global species extinction risk 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Anthropocene 
650 4 |a Antropoceno 
650 4 |a abatimiento de amenazas 
650 4 |a biodiversity conservation 
650 4 |a conservación de la biodiversidad 
650 4 |a evidence synthesis 
650 4 |a selection bias 
650 4 |a sesgo de selección 
650 4 |a síntesis de pruebas 
650 4 |a threat abatement 
700 1 |a Rushton, Stephen P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hickinbotham, Emily J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Suggitt, Andrew J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McGowan, Philip J K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mair, Louise  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 38(2024), 4 vom: 15. Juli, Seite e14271  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2024  |g number:4  |g day:15  |g month:07  |g pages:e14271 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14271  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 38  |j 2024  |e 4  |b 15  |c 07  |h e14271