|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM367058715 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250305162444.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
240114s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3353528
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n1223.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM367058715
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)38215324
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Rao, Sukrut
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Better Understanding Differences in Attribution Methods via Systematic Evaluations
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2024
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 07.05.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Deep neural networks are very successful on many vision tasks, but hard to interpret due to their black box nature. To overcome this, various post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. Evaluating such methods is challenging since no ground truth attributions exist. We thus propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods, to make comparisons between them more fair, and to make visual inspection more systematic. To address faithfulness, we propose a novel evaluation setting (DiFull) in which we carefully control which parts of the input can influence the output in order to distinguish possible from impossible attributions. To address fairness, we note that different methods are applied at different layers, which skews any comparison, and so evaluate all methods on the same layers (ML-Att) and discuss how this impacts their performance on quantitative metrics. For more systematic visualizations, we propose a scheme (AggAtt) to qualitatively evaluate the methods on complete datasets. We use these evaluation schemes to study strengths and shortcomings of some widely used attribution methods over a wide range of models. Finally, we propose a post-processing smoothing step that significantly improves the performance of some attribution methods, and discuss its applicability
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Bohle, Moritz
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Schiele, Bernt
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
|d 1979
|g 46(2024), 6 vom: 12. Juni, Seite 4090-4101
|w (DE-627)NLM098212257
|x 1939-3539
|7 nnas
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:46
|g year:2024
|g number:6
|g day:12
|g month:06
|g pages:4090-4101
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3353528
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 46
|j 2024
|e 6
|b 12
|c 06
|h 4090-4101
|