Knowledge Graphs in Practice : Characterizing their Users, Challenges, and Visualization Opportunities

This study presents insights from interviews with nineteen Knowledge Graph (KG) practitioners who work in both enterprise and academic settings on a wide variety of use cases. Through this study, we identify critical challenges experienced by KG practitioners when creating, exploring, and analyzing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. - 1996. - 30(2024), 1 vom: 26. Jan., Seite 584-594
1. Verfasser: Li, Harry (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Appleby, Gabriel, Brumar, Camelia Daniela, Chang, Remco, Suh, Ashley
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM365867977
003 DE-627
005 20240108140014.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326904  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1242.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM365867977 
035 |a (NLM)38096099 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Li, Harry  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Knowledge Graphs in Practice  |b Characterizing their Users, Challenges, and Visualization Opportunities 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 28.12.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a This study presents insights from interviews with nineteen Knowledge Graph (KG) practitioners who work in both enterprise and academic settings on a wide variety of use cases. Through this study, we identify critical challenges experienced by KG practitioners when creating, exploring, and analyzing KGs that could be alleviated through visualization design. Our findings reveal three major personas among KG practitioners - KG Builders, Analysts, and Consumers - each of whom have their own distinct expertise and needs. We discover that KG Builders would benefit from schema enforcers, while KG Analysts need customizable query builders that provide interim query results. For KG Consumers, we identify a lack of efficacy for node-link diagrams, and the need for tailored domain-specific visualizations to promote KG adoption and comprehension. Lastly, we find that implementing KGs effectively in practice requires both technical and social solutions that are not addressed with current tools, technologies, and collaborative workflows. From the analysis of our interviews, we distill several visualization research directions to improve KG usability, including knowledge cards that balance digestibility and discoverability, timeline views to track temporal changes, interfaces that support organic discovery, and semantic explanations for AI and machine learning predictions 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Appleby, Gabriel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brumar, Camelia Daniela  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chang, Remco  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Suh, Ashley  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics  |d 1996  |g 30(2024), 1 vom: 26. Jan., Seite 584-594  |w (DE-627)NLM098269445  |x 1941-0506  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g day:26  |g month:01  |g pages:584-594 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3326904  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 30  |j 2024  |e 1  |b 26  |c 01  |h 584-594