LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM361658168
003 DE-627
005 20240521234045.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.14176  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1414.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM361658168 
035 |a (NLM)37668112 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Albers, Heidi J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Anticipating anthropogenic threats in acquiring new protected areas 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 27.03.2024 
500 |a Date Revised 20.05.2024 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2023 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Biodiversity continues to decline despite protected area expansion and global conservation commitments. Biodiversity losses occur in existing protected areas, yet common methods used to select protected areas ignore postimplementation threats that reduce effectiveness. We developed a conservation planning framework that considers the ongoing anthropogenic threats within protected areas when selecting sites and the value of planning for costly threat-mitigating activities (i.e., enforcement) at the time of siting decisions. We applied the framework to a set of landscapes that contained the range of possible correlations between species richness and threat. Accounting for threats and implementing enforcement activities increased benefits from protected areas without increasing budgets. Threat information was valuable in conserving more species per spending level even without enforcement, especially on landscapes with randomly distributed threats. Benefits from including threat information and enforcement were greatest when human threats peaked in areas of high species richness and were lowest where human threats were negatively associated with species richness. Because acquiring information on threats and using threat-mitigating activities are costly, our findings can guide decision-makers regarding the settings in which to pursue these planning steps 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a aplicación 
650 4 |a conservación 
650 4 |a conservation 
650 4 |a enforcement 
650 4 |a optimización espacial 
650 4 |a paper parks 
650 4 |a parque de papel planeación sistemática de la conservación 
650 4 |a reserve site selection 
650 4 |a selección de sitio 
650 4 |a selección de sitio de reserva 
650 4 |a site selection 
650 4 |a spatial optimization 
650 4 |a systematic conservation planning 
700 1 |a Chang, Charlotte H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dissanayake, Sahan T M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Helmstedt, Kate J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kroetz, Kailin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Dilkina, Bistra  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zapata-Mor An, Irene  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nolte, Christoph  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ochoa-Ochoa, Leticia M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Spencer, Gwen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 38(2024), 2 vom: 04. Apr., Seite e14176  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2024  |g number:2  |g day:04  |g month:04  |g pages:e14176 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14176  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 38  |j 2024  |e 2  |b 04  |c 04  |h e14176