|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM36019138X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250305025239.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1177/0734242X231187560
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n1200.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM36019138X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)37519287
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Zhang, Xiaoyong
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Comparative study of different sewage sludge incineration treatments based on environmental and economic life cycle assessment
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2024
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 01.05.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 01.05.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Incineration is one of the most widely used treatments in the field of sewage sludge disposal. However, the choice of sewage sludge incineration process is still controversial. In this study, the comparative life cycle assessment of sewage sludge incineration processes, including the mono-incineration, co-incineration in coal-fired power plants and co-incineration in municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration plants, was carried out from the perspective of environment, carbon footprint and economy. The environmental assessment results show that terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity are the most significant environmental impacts. And the environmental performance of co-incineration in coal-fired power plants is the best. Moreover, the environmental impact is most sensitive to the dehydrant, electricity and fly ash chelating agent. Co-incineration in MSW incineration plants has the lowest carbon emissions, with only 70.50% and 82% of the carbon emissions from mono-incineration and co-incineration in coal-fired power plants, respectively. Furthermore, sewage sludge mono-incineration has the highest disposal costs because of the higher depreciation and solid waste disposal costs. The comprehensive evaluation results reveal that the optimization should focus on the selection of dehydrant and fly ash chelating agent, as well as the improvement of the equipment efficiency
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Comparative Study
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Sewage sludge
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a carbon footprint
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a co-incineration
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a comparative study
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a incineration
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a life cycle assessment
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Sewage
|2 NLM
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Coal Ash
|2 NLM
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Solid Waste
|2 NLM
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Coal
|2 NLM
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Chen, Xiaoping
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Xiao, Jun
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Peng, Xiaowei
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Wang, Jianguo
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ma, Jiliang
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Liu, Daoyin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Liang, Cai
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
|d 1991
|g 42(2024), 5 vom: 17. Mai, Seite 418-429
|w (DE-627)NLM098164791
|x 1096-3669
|7 nnas
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:42
|g year:2024
|g number:5
|g day:17
|g month:05
|g pages:418-429
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231187560
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 42
|j 2024
|e 5
|b 17
|c 05
|h 418-429
|