Factors that Influence Women's Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section : A Meta-ethnography

Copyright: © International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. - 2014. - 11(2023), 3 vom: 12. Juli, Seite 152-168
1. Verfasser: Hamilton, Emma L (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: McLaughlin, Karen, Mollart, Lyndall
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:International journal of community based nursing and midwifery
Schlagworte:Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Health personnel Midwifery Obstetric labour complications Qualitative research
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM359894399
003 DE-627
005 20231226081841.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97229.2171  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1199.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM359894399 
035 |a (NLM)37489229 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Hamilton, Emma L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Factors that Influence Women's Decision on the Mode of Birth After a Previous Caesarean Section  |b A Meta-ethnography 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.07.2023 
500 |a Date Revised 25.09.2023 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright: © International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery. 
520 |a Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates are continuing to rise worldwide. Elective repeat CS (ERCS) greatly contribute to the rising rate which increases unnecessary risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is a safe mode of birth for most women; however, uptake remains low. Our objective is to find the factors that influence women's decision-making to support informed choices for the mode of next birth after caesarean section (NBAC) 
520 |a Methods: A literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, Embase, EmCare, Cochrane Library and Medline databases. Primary, qualitative, peer reviewed, English language research articles were assessed according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Articles were systematically assessed for inclusion or exclusion. Included studies were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative studies checklist, Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnography approach synthesised themes 
520 |a Results: Fourteen primary research articles were included. Six studies on 287 women focused on VBAC, and eight studies examined both VBAC and ERCS with 1861 women and 311 blogs. Thematic analysis yielded four primary themes: Influence of health professionals, impact of previous birth experience, optimal experience, and being in control 
520 |a Conclusion: This meta-ethnography highlights health professionals' influence on women's decision making. To assist in decision-making, women need supportive health professionals who provide the current evidence-informed information about risks and benefits of each mode of birth. Health professionals need skills to provide supportive shared decision-making, debrief women regarding indications for their primary caesarean, and address issues of safety, fear, and expectations of childbirth 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Health personnel 
650 4 |a Midwifery 
650 4 |a Obstetric labour complications 
650 4 |a Qualitative research 
700 1 |a McLaughlin, Karen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mollart, Lyndall  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of community based nursing and midwifery  |d 2014  |g 11(2023), 3 vom: 12. Juli, Seite 152-168  |w (DE-627)NLM243102372  |x 2322-2476  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g day:12  |g month:07  |g pages:152-168 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97229.2171  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_271 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_288 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 11  |j 2023  |e 3  |b 12  |c 07  |h 152-168