Image-derived instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation with 3D planning for glenoid component placement in reverse total shoulder replacements : a randomized controlled trial

© 2023 The Author(s).

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 7(2023), 4 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 614-622
1. Verfasser: Boekel, Pamela (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rikard-Bell, Matthew, Grant, Andrea, Brandon, Benjamin, Doma, Kenji, O'Callaghan, William B, Wilkinson, Matthew, Morse, Levi
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article 3D preoperative planning Arthroplasty Image-derived instrumentation Orthopedic surgery Patient-specific instrumentation Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2023 The Author(s).
Hypothesis: Glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is important for stability and longevity, with techniques such as image-derived instrumentation (IDI) developed for improving implant placement accuracy. We performed a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing glenoid baseplate insertion accuracy with 3D preoperative planning and IDI jigs vs. 3D preoperative planning and conventional instrumentation
Methods: All patients had a preoperative 3D computed tomography to create an IDI; then underwent rTSA according to their randomized method. Repeat computed tomography scans performed at six weeks postoperatively were compared to the preoperative plan to assess for accuracy of implantation. Patient-reported outcome measures and plain radiographs were collected with 2-year follow-up
Results: Forty-seven rTSA patients were included (IDI n = 24, conventional instrumentation n = 23). The IDI group was more likely to have a guidewire placement within 2mm of the preoperative plan in the superior/inferior plane (P = .01); and exhibited a smaller degree of error when the native glenoid retroversion was >10° (P = .047). There was no difference in patient-reported outcome measures or other radiographic parameters between the two groups
Conclusion: IDI is an accurate method for glenoid guidewire and component placement in rTSA, particularly in the superior/inferior plane and in glenoids with native retroversion >10°, when compared to conventional instrumentation
Beschreibung:Date Revised 18.07.2023
published: Electronic-eCollection
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:2666-6383
DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.004