|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM35925411X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240521234022.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231226s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/cobi.14144
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1414.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM35925411X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)37424366
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Drechsler, Martin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Flexibility trade-offs in conservation offsets
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2024
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 30.01.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.05.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2023 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Conservation offsets promise cost-effective conservation of biodiversity, especially under economic and environmental change, because they represent a more flexible approach to biodiversity conservation, allowing for the economic development of ecologically valuable land provided that this development is offset by restoration of previously developed areas. The level of flexibility is determined by the trading rules. Lax rules allow for more flexibility, which promises cost savings, but will likely lead to unintended loss of biodiversity. I analyzed the trade-off between economic costs and ecological benefits (biodiversity conservation) in biodiversity offsetting with an ecological-economic model that considered the three main types of offset flexibility: spatial, temporal, and ecosystem type. I sought to examine the influence of ecological and economic conditions on offset flexibility trade-offs. Large variation in the conservation costs and small costs of habitat restoration strongly increased trading activity and reduced the ecological benefit. The ecological benefit was most sensitive to spatial flexibility when a short range of ecological interaction was considered. At a large interaction range, spatial flexibility delivered large cost savings without overly reducing the ecological benefit. Risks and time lags associated with habitat restoration favored an offsetting scheme in which credits are awarded with the initiation of restoration projects rather than their successful completion-given appropriate offsetting multipliers were chosen. Altogether, under scarce resources, the level of flexibility in an offsetting scheme should be chosen by carefully balancing ecological benefits and economic costs
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a compensaciones por conservación
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a compromiso
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a conservation offsets
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a cost-effectiveness
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a dinámica
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a dynamic
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a ecological-economic model
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a espacial
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a flexibilidad
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a flexibility
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a modelo ecológico-económico
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a spatial
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a trade-off
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 保护补偿
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 利弊权衡
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 动态
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 成本效益
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 灵活性
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 生态经济模型
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a 空间
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1999
|g 38(2024), 1 vom: 09. Feb., Seite e14144
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:38
|g year:2024
|g number:1
|g day:09
|g month:02
|g pages:e14144
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14144
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 38
|j 2024
|e 1
|b 09
|c 02
|h e14144
|