|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM356591972 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231226070805.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107721
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1188.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM356591972
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)37156069
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (PII)S0981-9428(23)00232-2
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Mathur, Piyush
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Engineered nanoparticles in plant growth
|b Phytotoxicity concerns and the strategies for their attenuation
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2023
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 23.05.2023
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 23.05.2023
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In the agricultural sector, the use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) has been acclaimed as the next big thing for sustaining and increasing crop productivity. A vast amount of literature is available regarding the growth-promoting attributes of different ENPs. In this context, it has been emphasized that the ENPs can bolster vegetative growth, leaf development, and seed setting and also help in mitigating the effects of abiotic and biotic stresses. At the same time, there have been a lot of speculations and concerns regarding the phytotoxicity of ENPs off-late. In this connection, many research articles have presented the negative effects of ENPs on plant systems. These studies have highlighted that almost all the ENPs impart a certain degree of phytotoxicity in terms of reduction in growth, biomass, impairment of photosynthesis, oxidative status of plant cells, etc. Mostly, the ENPs based on metal or metal oxides (Cd, Cr, Pb, Ag, Ce, etc.) and nonmetals (C) that are introduced into the environment are known to incite inhibitory effects. However, the phytotoxicity of ENPs are known to be determined mostly by the chemical nature of the element, size, surface charge, coating molecules, and abiotic factors like pH and light. This review article, therefore, elucidates the phytotoxic properties of different ENPs and the plant responses induced at the molecular level subjected to nanoparticle exposure. Moreover, the article highlights the probable strategies that may be adopted for the suppression of the phytotoxicity of ENPs to ensure the safe and sustainable application of ENPs in crop fields
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Review
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Biotransformation
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Genotoxicity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Heavy metals
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Nanofertilizer
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Phytotoxicity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Quantum dots
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Metals
|2 NLM
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Oxides
|2 NLM
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Chakraborty, Rakhi
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Aftab, Tariq
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Roy, Swarnendu
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB
|d 1991
|g 199(2023) vom: 15. Juni, Seite 107721
|w (DE-627)NLM098178261
|x 1873-2690
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:199
|g year:2023
|g day:15
|g month:06
|g pages:107721
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107721
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 199
|j 2023
|b 15
|c 06
|h 107721
|