|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM353598267 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231226060356.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.2166/wst.2023.036
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1178.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM353598267
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)36853774
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Kwon, Soonwon
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sustainability assessment of retrofitting alternatives for large and old wastewater treatment plants in Seoul
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2023
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 02.03.2023
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 02.03.2023
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Old wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) must be upgraded to alleviate the problems associated with aging and reduce their total environmental impacts. To enhance the environmental sustainability in retrofitting large and old WWTPs, the decision-making process for selecting the most appropriate alternative is complicated. In this study, evaluation criteria were proposed to select the most sustainable alternatives for mid- to long-term retrofitting plans for a large WWTP with the treatment capacity of 1.6 M m3/d, which is initially built in 1987. An analytic hierarchy process was applied to estimate the weights of each criterion. Fourteen experts evaluated the relative importance of criteria through pairwise comparisons. In order to assess the current retrofitting opinions, three retrofitting alternatives were constructed: A focused on energy sufficiency; B expanded the bioreactor capacity and enhancement of the facility for incinerating the sludge leaving the anaerobic digestor; C emphasized the treatment of contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs). A achieved the highest score (0.623) owing to the environmental benefits associated with recycling and first flush stormwater treatment. C exhibited the second highest score (0.612) as the focus on CECs removal. B corresponded to the lowest sustainability (0.426), with the lowest scores pertaining to effective land use and first flush stormwater treatment
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Zhang, Chuanli
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Oh, Jeill
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Park, Kyoohong
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
|d 1986
|g 87(2023), 4 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 969-986
|w (DE-627)NLM098149431
|x 0273-1223
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:87
|g year:2023
|g number:4
|g day:01
|g month:02
|g pages:969-986
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2023.036
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 87
|j 2023
|e 4
|b 01
|c 02
|h 969-986
|