A Comparison of Peel-Induced Maculopathy Following ILM Peeling Using a Microvacuum Pick Versus Forceps

OBJECTIVE: To compare peel-induced maculopathy (PIM) using surgical forceps versus the microvacuum pick (MVP)

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 54(2023), 1 vom: 10. Jan., Seite 37-42
1. Verfasser: Thomas, Akshay S (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Thomas, Mridul K, Davis, Emily C, Fowler, Samuel, Schneider, Eric W, Recchia, Franco M, Awh, Carl C
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
Schlagworte:Journal Article
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE: To compare peel-induced maculopathy (PIM) using surgical forceps versus the microvacuum pick (MVP)
METHODS: Consecutive eyes undergoing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling using either the MVP or forceps were assessed. En face optical coherence tomography (OCT) images at the level of the nerve fiber layer were generated for 6-month postoperative visit. The percentage of the imaged area showing PIM was termed the PIM index. PIM severity was additionally measured using a qualitative PIM severity scale
RESULTS: Seventy-four consecutive eyes underwent ILM peeling with either the MVP (36/74; 49%) or forceps (38/74; 51%). At month-6 postoperatively, the mean PIM index for forceps was 7.7% vs 4.7% for the MVP (P < 0.001, R2 = 0.15). At 6 months, 26/38 eyes (68.5%) in the forceps group had either moderate or severe PIM compared to 12/36 eyes (33.3%) in the MVP group (P = 0.001)
CONCLUSIONS: ILM peeling with the MVP resulted in lower PIM severity compared to forceps. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:37-42.]
Beschreibung:Date Completed 12.01.2023
Date Revised 19.02.2023
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:2325-8179
DOI:10.3928/23258160-20221216-01