Assessing the potential chronic, sublethal and lethal ecotoxicity of land-applying biosolids on Folsomia candida and Lumbricus terrestris

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecotoxicology (London, England). - 1992. - 31(2022), 10 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 1520-1535
1. Verfasser: Puddephatt, Karen J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: McCarthy, Lynda H, Serre, Bryant M
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ecotoxicology (London, England)
Schlagworte:Review Journal Article Animals Biosolids Earthworms Land-application Springtails Toxicity
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM349670021
003 DE-627
005 20231226043200.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10646-022-02606-7  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1165.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM349670021 
035 |a (NLM)36454360 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Puddephatt, Karen J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Assessing the potential chronic, sublethal and lethal ecotoxicity of land-applying biosolids on Folsomia candida and Lumbricus terrestris 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 15.12.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 04.01.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a ErratumIn: Ecotoxicology. 2023 Jan;32(1):135. - PMID 36598631 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. 
520 |a The ecotoxicity of biosolids has been studied extensively using single-compound toxicity testing and 'spiking' studies; however, little knowledge exists on the ecotoxicity of biosolids as they are land-applied in the Canadian context. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the chronic, sub-lethal (i.e., behavioural), and lethal impacts of land- applying biosolids on the environmentally relevant Folsomia candida (springtails) and Lumbricus terrestris (earthworms) and concomitantly ascertain whether the use of biosolids for nutrient amendment is a sustainable practice. This study is part of a larger multi-compartment programme which includes terrestrial plants and aquatic arthropods. After a review of existing government protocols and research, the current study suggests new environmentally relevant bioassays as to elucidate the true nature of the potential ecotoxicity of land-applying biosolids, within a laboratory context. Specifically, protocols were developed (e.g., shoebox bioassays for L. terrestris sub-lethal testing) or modified (e.g., using Evans' boxes (Evans 1947) for chronic and sub-lethal testing on L. terrestris). Subsequently, two biosolids were tested on springtails and earthworms using avoidance and reproductive bioassay endpoints, at application rates that represent standard (8 tonnes ha-1) and worst-case scenarios (22 tonnes ha-1). Results indicated no effect of biosolids at the environmentally relevant concentration; the worst-case scenario exhibited a positive significantly significant relationship (indicating preference for treatment conditions). We suggest that further assessment of the potential ecotoxicological impact of biosolids employ (i) environmentally relevant organisms, (ii) appropriate bioassays including the use of whole-organism endpoints, and (iii) multi-kingdom testing (e.g., Kingdom Plantae, Animalia) to comprehensively elucidate answers. Lastly, in situ (field assays) are strongly encouraged for future studies 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Animals 
650 4 |a Biosolids 
650 4 |a Earthworms 
650 4 |a Land-application 
650 4 |a Springtails 
650 4 |a Toxicity 
700 1 |a McCarthy, Lynda H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Serre, Bryant M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ecotoxicology (London, England)  |d 1992  |g 31(2022), 10 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 1520-1535  |w (DE-627)NLM098212214  |x 1573-3017  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2022  |g number:10  |g day:01  |g month:12  |g pages:1520-1535 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-022-02606-7  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 31  |j 2022  |e 10  |b 01  |c 12  |h 1520-1535