Optimal stomatal theory predicts CO2 responses of stomatal conductance in both gymnosperm and angiosperm trees

© 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 237(2023), 4 vom: 06. Feb., Seite 1229-1241
1. Verfasser: Gardner, Anna (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Jiang, Mingkai, Ellsworth, David S, MacKenzie, A Robert, Pritchard, Jeremy, Bader, Martin Karl-Friedrich, Barton, Craig V M, Bernacchi, Carl, Calfapietra, Carlo, Crous, Kristine Y, Dusenge, Mirindi Eric, Gimeno, Teresa E, Hall, Marianne, Lamba, Shubhangi, Leuzinger, Sebastian, Uddling, Johan, Warren, Jeffrey, Wallin, Göran, Medlyn, Belinda E
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Meta-Analysis Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't climate change deciduous evergreen free-air CO2 enrichment photosynthesis water-use efficiency Carbon Dioxide mehr... 142M471B3J Water 059QF0KO0R
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation.
Optimal stomatal theory predicts that stomata operate to maximise photosynthesis (Anet ) and minimise transpirational water loss to achieve optimal intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE). We tested whether this theory can predict stomatal responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 (eCO2 ), and whether it can capture differences in responsiveness among woody plant functional types (PFTs). We conducted a meta-analysis of tree studies of the effect of eCO2 on iWUE and its components Anet and stomatal conductance (gs ). We compared three PFTs, using the unified stomatal optimisation (USO) model to account for confounding effects of leaf-air vapour pressure difference (D). We expected smaller gs , but greater Anet , responses to eCO2 in gymnosperms compared with angiosperm PFTs. We found that iWUE increased in proportion to increasing eCO2 in all PFTs, and that increases in Anet had stronger effects than reductions in gs . The USO model correctly captured stomatal behaviour with eCO2 across most datasets. The chief difference among PFTs was a lower stomatal slope parameter (g1 ) for the gymnosperm, compared with angiosperm, species. Land surface models can use the USO model to describe stomatal behaviour under changing atmospheric CO2 conditions
Beschreibung:Date Completed 20.01.2023
Date Revised 01.02.2023
published: Print-Electronic
figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21252609.v1
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1469-8137
DOI:10.1111/nph.18618