No difference in range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using standard or constrained liners : a matched cohort study

© 2022 The Author(s).

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JSES international. - 2020. - 6(2022), 6 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 929-934
1. Verfasser: Goodloe, J Brett (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Denard, Patrick J, Lederman, Evan, Gobezie, Reuben, Werner, Brian C
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:JSES international
Schlagworte:Journal Article Constrained Glenohumeral arthritis Instability Outcomes Reverse shoulder arthroplasty Shoulder motion
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM348670435
003 DE-627
005 20250304021524.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.07.004  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1161.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM348670435 
035 |a (NLM)36353430 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Goodloe, J Brett  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a No difference in range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using standard or constrained liners  |b a matched cohort study 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 11.11.2022 
500 |a published: Electronic-eCollection 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2022 The Author(s). 
520 |a Background: Prosthetic instability is one of the most common short-term complications following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Numerous strategies exist to attempt to mitigate this complication, including utilization of constrained polyethylene humeral liners. A concern of constrained humeral liners is that they may come at the expense of restricted rotational range of motion (ROM). The purpose of the present study is to compare range of ROM and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and satisfaction among matched cohorts using constrained vs. unconstrained liners after RTSA 
520 |a Methods: A multicenter shoulder arthroplasty registry was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with two-year clinical follow-up after RTSA with constrained liners used at the surgeon's discretion. All patients had the same inlay humeral prosthesis with a 135° neck shaft angle. This study cohort was matched 1:2 to control patients who underwent RTSA with standard liners based on age, sex, total glenoid-sided lateralization, glenosphere diameter, and surgery performed on the dominant arm. Improvement in PROs and ROM was compared between groups 
520 |a Results: Twenty-two patients were identified who underwent RTSA with a constrained humeral liner; these were compared to 44 matched patients with standard liners. The groups were found to have no notable differences in demographics, baseline PROs and ROM. At two years postoperatively, both cohorts demonstrated improvements in all PROs without statistically significant differences between the two groups. There were no differences between groups in improvement in any ROM measure, including forward flexion (constrained: 54°, standard: 57°, P = .771), external rotation at the side (constrained: 42°, standard: 41°, P = .906) or internal rotation at 90° of abduction (constrained: 24°, standard: 20°, P = .587) 
520 |a Conclusions: For an inlay humeral prosthesis with a 135° neck shaft angle, utilization of a constrained liner for RTSA demonstrates no significant difference in ROM or PROs compared to a well-matched cohort of patients who underwent RTSA with a standard polyethylene humeral liner. These are reassuring data for using constrained liners when there is intraoperative concern for prosthetic instability 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Constrained 
650 4 |a Glenohumeral arthritis 
650 4 |a Instability 
650 4 |a Outcomes 
650 4 |a Reverse shoulder arthroplasty 
650 4 |a Shoulder motion 
700 1 |a Denard, Patrick J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lederman, Evan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gobezie, Reuben  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Werner, Brian C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t JSES international  |d 2020  |g 6(2022), 6 vom: 25. Nov., Seite 929-934  |w (DE-627)NLM307818438  |x 2666-6383  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2022  |g number:6  |g day:25  |g month:11  |g pages:929-934 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.07.004  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 6  |j 2022  |e 6  |b 25  |c 11  |h 929-934