|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM348670400 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231226040818.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.07.008
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1162.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM348670400
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)36353427
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gurnani, Navin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Shoulder muscle activity after latissimus dorsi transfer in an active elevation
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2022
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 11.11.2022
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Electronic-eCollection
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2022 The Authors.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Background: After latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT), an increase in scapulothoracic (ST) contribution in thoracohumeral (TH) elevation is observed when compared to the asymptomatic shoulder. It is not known which shoulder muscles contribute to this change in shoulder kinematics, and whether the timing of muscle recruitment has altered after LDT. The aim of the study was to identify which shoulder muscles and what timing of muscle recruitment are responsible for the increased ST contribution and shoulder elevation after LDT for a massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear (MIRT)
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Methods: Thirteen patients with a preoperative pseudoparalysis and MIRT were recruited after LDT with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking was used to assess maximum active elevation of the shoulder (MAES) in both the LDT and the asymptomatic contralateral shoulder (ACS). Surface electromyography (EMG) tracked activation (% EMG max) and activation timing of the latissimus dorsi (LD), deltoid, teres major, trapezius (upper, middle and lower) and serratus anterior muscles were collected. MAES was studied in forward flexion, scapular abduction and abduction in the coronal plane
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Results: In MAES, no difference in thoracohumeral motion was observed between the LDT and ACS, P = .300. However, the glenohumeral motion for MAES was significantly lower in LDT shoulders F(1,12) = 11.230, P = .006. The LD % EMG max did not differ between the LDT and ACS in MAES. A higher % EMG max was found for the deltoid F(1,12) = 17.241, P = .001, and upper trapezius F(1,10) = 13.612, P = .004 in the LDT shoulder during MAES. The middle trapezius only showed a higher significant difference in % EMG max for scapular abduction, P = .020 (LDT, 52.3 ± 19.4; ACS, 38.1 ± 19.7).The % EMG max of the lower trapezius, serratus anterior and teres major did not show any difference in all movement types between the LDT and ACS and no difference in timing of recruitment of all the shoulder muscles was observed
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Conclusions: After LDT in patients with a MIRT and preoperative pseudoparalysis, the LD muscle did not alter its % EMG max during MAES when compared to the ACS. The cranial transfer of the LD tendon with its native %EMG max, together with the increased %EMG max of the deltoid, middle and upper trapezius muscles could be responsible for the increased ST contribution. The increased glenohumeral joint reaction force could in turn increase active elevation after LDT in a previous pseudoparalytic shoulder
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Electromyography
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Latissimus dorsi
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Massive rotator cuff tear
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Muscle transfer
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Shoulder surgery
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a van Deurzen, Derek F P
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Willems, W Jaap
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Janssen, Thomas W J
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Veeger, DirkJan H E J
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t JSES international
|d 2020
|g 6(2022), 6 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 970-977
|w (DE-627)NLM307818438
|x 2666-6383
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:6
|g year:2022
|g number:6
|g day:15
|g month:11
|g pages:970-977
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.07.008
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_50
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_65
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 6
|j 2022
|e 6
|b 15
|c 11
|h 970-977
|