Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity

© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 37(2023), 2 vom: 18. Apr., Seite e14008
1. Verfasser: Muenzel, Dominic (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Critchell, Kay, Cox, Courtney, Campbell, Stuart J, Jakub, Raymond, Chollett, Iliana, Krueck, Nils, Holstein, Daniel, Treml, Eric A, Beger, Maria
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Marxan Marxan软件 conectividad connectivity diseño de reservas marinas dispersión larval graph theory mehr... larval dispersal marine reserve design planeación sistemática de la conservación systematic conservation planning teoría de gráficos 图论 幼体扩散 海洋保护区设计 系统保护规划 连接度
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM346935644
003 DE-627
005 20250303215719.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.14008  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1156.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM346935644 
035 |a (NLM)36178033 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Muenzel, Dominic  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 30.03.2023 
500 |a Date Revised 14.04.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Larval dispersal is an important component of marine reserve networks. Two conceptually different approaches to incorporate dispersal connectivity into spatial planning of these networks exist, and it is an open question as to when either is most appropriate. Candidate reserve sites can be selected individually based on local properties of connectivity or on a spatial dependency-based approach of selecting clusters of strongly connected habitat patches. The first acts on individual sites, whereas the second acts on linked pairs of sites. We used a combination of larval dispersal simulations representing different seascapes and case studies of biophysical larval dispersal models in the Coral Triangle region and the province of Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia, to compare the performance of these 2 methods in the spatial planning software Marxan. We explored the reserve design performance implications of different dispersal distances and patterns based on the equilibrium settlement of larvae in protected and unprotected areas. We further assessed different assumptions about metapopulation contributions from unprotected areas, including the case of 100% depletion and more moderate scenarios. The spatial dependency method was suitable when dispersal was limited, a high proportion of the area of interest was substantially degraded, or the target amount of habitat protected was low. Conversely, when subpopulations were well connected, the 100% depletion was relaxed, or more habitat was protected, protecting individual sites with high scores in metrics of connectivity was a better strategy. Spatial dependency methods generally produced more spatially clustered solutions with more benefits inside than outside reserves compared with site-based methods. Therefore, spatial dependency methods potentially provide better results for ecological persistence objectives over enhancing fisheries objectives, and vice versa. Different spatial prioritization methods of using connectivity are appropriate for different contexts, depending on dispersal characteristics, unprotected area contributions, habitat protection targets, and specific management objectives. Comparación entre los métodos de priorización de la conservación espacial con sitio y la conectividad espacial basada en la dependencia 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Marxan 
650 4 |a Marxan软件 
650 4 |a conectividad 
650 4 |a connectivity 
650 4 |a diseño de reservas marinas 
650 4 |a dispersión larval 
650 4 |a graph theory 
650 4 |a larval dispersal 
650 4 |a marine reserve design 
650 4 |a planeación sistemática de la conservación 
650 4 |a systematic conservation planning 
650 4 |a teoría de gráficos 
650 4 |a 图论 
650 4 |a 幼体扩散 
650 4 |a 海洋保护区设计 
650 4 |a 系统保护规划 
650 4 |a 连接度 
700 1 |a Critchell, Kay  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cox, Courtney  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Campbell, Stuart J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jakub, Raymond  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chollett, Iliana  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Krueck, Nils  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Holstein, Daniel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Treml, Eric A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Beger, Maria  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 37(2023), 2 vom: 18. Apr., Seite e14008  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g day:18  |g month:04  |g pages:e14008 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14008  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 37  |j 2023  |e 2  |b 18  |c 04  |h e14008