Effect of semantics in the study of tolerance for wolves

© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 37(2023), 2 vom: 28. Apr., Seite e14003
1. Verfasser: Carlson, Shelby C (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Dietsch, Alia M, Slagle, Kristina M, Bruskotter, Jeremy T
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't actitudes attitudes behavior capacidad de aceptación a la fauna ciencias sociales de la conservación comportamiento conservation social science lobos mehr... percepción del riesgo protección risk perception stewardship tolerance tolerancia wildlife acceptance capacity wolves 态度, 行为, 保护社会科学, 风险认知, 管理工作, 容忍度, 野生动物接受度, 狼
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM346155282
003 DE-627
005 20250303200350.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.14003  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n1153.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM346155282 
035 |a (NLM)36098633 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Carlson, Shelby C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Effect of semantics in the study of tolerance for wolves 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 30.03.2023 
500 |a Date Revised 14.04.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a As conservation scholars increasingly recognize the critical role of human thought and behavior in determining the persistence of biodiversity across the globe, a growing line of inquiry regarding the validity and comparability of previous applications of core psychological concepts has emerged. Specifically, inconsistent measurement and use of terms, such as attitudes and acceptance, reveal important questions about previous approaches. Given that these concepts differ by definition, yet have been used interchangeably, we explored what drives differences in people's responses when each concept is operationalized in the context of a contested wildlife species, the gray wolf (Canis lupus). To do so, we used data from a 2014 survey of U.S. residents (n = 1287) to test how measures of six concepts (i.e., acceptance, attitudes, benefits, risks, [prior] behavior, and behavioral intentions) often employed in the conservation social sciences were related with a broad set of possible explanatory variables. Despite moderate to strong correlations between all concepts measured (| Pearson's r | = 0.39-0.65, p < 0.001), results revealed considerable variation in their respective relationships with identical explanatory variables. Specifically, although wildlife value orientation (i.e., domination or mutualism) operated fairly consistently across cognitive and behavioral concepts, the relationship between the six concepts and other factors, such as social trust, identification with various interest groups (i.e., hunter, farmer, or rancher, environmentalist, and animal rights advocate), and political ideology (i.e., liberal vs. conservative), varied considerably. Our findings underscore that differences exist in these measures, which could have serious implications for conservationists integrating social science findings in their decision-making processes if they are unaware of the theoretical underpinnings of and distinctions between core psychological concepts 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a actitudes 
650 4 |a attitudes 
650 4 |a behavior 
650 4 |a capacidad de aceptación a la fauna 
650 4 |a ciencias sociales de la conservación 
650 4 |a comportamiento 
650 4 |a conservation social science 
650 4 |a lobos 
650 4 |a percepción del riesgo 
650 4 |a protección 
650 4 |a risk perception 
650 4 |a stewardship 
650 4 |a tolerance 
650 4 |a tolerancia 
650 4 |a wildlife acceptance capacity 
650 4 |a wolves 
650 4 |a 态度, 行为, 保护社会科学, 风险认知, 管理工作, 容忍度, 野生动物接受度, 狼 
700 1 |a Dietsch, Alia M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Slagle, Kristina M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bruskotter, Jeremy T  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 37(2023), 2 vom: 28. Apr., Seite e14003  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g day:28  |g month:04  |g pages:e14003 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14003  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 37  |j 2023  |e 2  |b 28  |c 04  |h e14003