|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM345737326 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231226025744.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231226s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00765.x
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1152.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM345737326
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)36056508
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Falster, Daniel S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Leaf size and angle vary widely across species
|b what consequences for light interception?
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2003
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 07.09.2022
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a • Architecture can vary widely across species. Both steeper leaf angles and increased self-shading are thought to reduce potential carbon gain by decreasing total light interception. An alternative hypothesis is that steeper leaf angles have evolved to improve day-long carbon gain by emphasising light interception from low angles. • Here we relate variation in architectural properties (leaf angle and leaf size) to cross-species patterns of leaf display, light capture and simulated carbon gain in branching-units of 38 perennial species occurring at two sites in Australian forest. Architectural comparison was made possible by combining 3D-digitising with the architecture model YPLANT. • Species with shallow angled leaves had greater daily light interception and potentially greater carbon gain. Self-shading, rather than leaf angle, explained most variance between species in light capture and potential carbon gain. Species average leaf size was the most important determinant of self-shading. • Our results provide the first cross-species evidence that steeper leaf angles function to reduce exposure to excess light levels during the middle of the day, more than to maximise carbon gain
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a YPLANT
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a architecture
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a digitising
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a light interception
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a self-shading
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Westoby, Mark
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t The New phytologist
|d 1979
|g 158(2003), 3 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 509-525
|w (DE-627)NLM09818248X
|x 1469-8137
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:158
|g year:2003
|g number:3
|g day:15
|g month:06
|g pages:509-525
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00765.x
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 158
|j 2003
|e 3
|b 15
|c 06
|h 509-525
|