Acid mine drainage (AMD) treatment using galvanic electrochemical system Al-Cu

Acid mine drainage was evaluated using a galvanic (GV) electrochemical system, Al-Cu (anode/cathode), based on a 32 factorial design. The factors analyzed were anodic area/volume ratios (A/V) of 0.037, 0.072, and 0.112 cm2/cm3, and treatment time from 0.25-8 h, and analyses were performed in duplica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental technology. - 1993. - 44(2023), 28 vom: 23. Dez., Seite 4424-4440
1. Verfasser: González-Hernández, Romel (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Martínez-Miranda, Verónica, Linares-Hernández, Ivonne, Castillo-Suárez, Luis Antonio, Ceballos, Giovanni Sosa, Cortés-Martínez, Raúl
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Environmental technology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Acid mine drainage Al–Cu electrodes environmental pollution galvanic cell heavy metals Lead 2P299V784P Water Pollutants, Chemical Metals, Heavy mehr... Arsenic N712M78A8G Acids
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Acid mine drainage was evaluated using a galvanic (GV) electrochemical system, Al-Cu (anode/cathode), based on a 32 factorial design. The factors analyzed were anodic area/volume ratios (A/V) of 0.037, 0.072, and 0.112 cm2/cm3, and treatment time from 0.25-8 h, and analyses were performed in duplicate with 11 degrees of freedom. The response variables were the total dissolved solids and concentrations of As, Cu, Co, Cr, Pb, Fe, Ni, and SO42-. The pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were monitored during the process. Significant differences between treatments were determined by analysis of variance with Tukey's test (p < 0.05) using Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I software. The results showed that a greater electrode surface, A/V ratio, and treatment time improved pollutant removal. The spontaneous reactions generated by the galvanic cell, through the current that flows owing to the potential difference between the Al and Cu electrodes, allows the removal of heavy metals, arsenic, and SO42- by coagulation and precipitation mechanisms. The removal efficiencies achieved were Cu (99.1%), As (76.6%), Ni (80.2%), Pb (83.6%), Cr (100%), Fe (93.71%), and 92.9% for sulfates. The X-ray diffraction and Raman analyses of the solid fraction indicated that cuprite was formed with a purity of 96%, and the recovery of Cu by the GV system may be a viable option for mining companies
Beschreibung:Date Completed 06.10.2023
Date Revised 06.10.2023
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1479-487X
DOI:10.1080/09593330.2022.2093653