Global evaluation of inhibitor impacts on ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils : A meta-analysis

© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology. - 1999. - 28(2022), 17 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 5121-5141
1. Verfasser: Fan, Daijia (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: He, Wentian, Smith, Ward N, Drury, Craig F, Jiang, Rong, Grant, Brian B, Shi, Yaoyao, Song, Daping, Chen, Yanhua, Wang, Xuexia, He, Ping, Zou, Guoyuan
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Global change biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Meta-Analysis ammonia volatilization environmental condition management practice nitrification inhibitor nitrous oxide emission urease inhibitor Fertilizers Soil mehr... Ammonia 7664-41-7 Nitrous Oxide K50XQU1029 Nitrogen N762921K75
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Inhibitors are widely considered an efficient tool for reducing nitrogen (N) loss and improving N use efficiency, but their effectiveness is highly variable across agroecosystems. In this study, we synthesized 182 studies (222 sites) worldwide to evaluate the impacts of inhibitors (urease inhibitors [UI], nitrification inhibitors [NI] and combined inhibitors) on crop yields and gaseous N loss (ammonia [NH3 ] and nitrous oxide [N2 O] emissions) and explored their responses to different management and environmental factors including inhibitor application timing, fertilization regime, cropping system, water management, soil properties and climatic conditions using subgroup meta-analysis, meta-regression and multivariate analyses. The UI were most effective in enhancing crop yields (by 5%) and reducing NH3 volatilization (by 51%), whereas NI were most effective at reducing N2 O emissions (by 49%). The application of UI mitigates NH3 loss and increases crop yields especially in high NH3 -N loss scenarios, whereas NI application would minimize the net N2 O emissions and the resultant environmental impacts especially in low NH3 -N loss scenarios. Alternatively, the combined application of UI and NI enables producers to balance crop production and environmental conservation goals without pollution tradeoffs. The inhibitor efficacy for decreasing gaseous N loss was dependent upon soil and climatic conditions and management practices. Notably, both meta-regression and multivariate analyses suggest that inhibitors provide a greater opportunity for reducing fertilizer N inputs in high-N-surplus systems and presumably favor crop yield enhancement under soil N deficiency situations. The pursuit of an improved understanding of the interactions between plant-soil-climate-management systems and different types of inhibitors should continue to optimize the effectiveness of inhibitors for reducing environmental losses while increasing productivity
Beschreibung:Date Completed 03.08.2022
Date Revised 26.09.2022
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1365-2486
DOI:10.1111/gcb.16294