Assessing protected area vulnerability to climate change in a case study of South African national parks

© 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 36(2022), 5 vom: 12. Okt., Seite e13941
1. Verfasser: Coldrey, Kevin M (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Turpie, Jane K, Midgley, Guy, Scheiter, Simon, Hannah, Lee, Roehrdanz, Patrick R, Foden, Wendy B
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2022
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't adaptive capacity biodiversidad biodiversity capacidad de adaptación impactos potenciales infraestructura infrastructure potential impacts mehr... tourism turismo 基础设施 旅游业 潜在影响适应能力 生物多样性
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM341706973
003 DE-627
005 20231226012404.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13941  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n1138.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM341706973 
035 |a (NLM)35648687 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Coldrey, Kevin M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Assessing protected area vulnerability to climate change in a case study of South African national parks 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 03.10.2022 
500 |a Date Revised 06.01.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Climate change is challenging the ability of protected areas (PAs) to meet their objectives. To improve PA planning, we developed a framework for assessing PA vulnerability to climate change based on consideration of potential climate change impacts on species and their habitats and resource use. Furthermore, the capacity of PAs to adapt to these climate threats was determined through assessment of PA management effectiveness, adjacent land use, and financial resilience. Users reach a PA-specific vulnerability score and rank based on scoring of these categories. We applied the framework to South Africa's 19 national parks. Because the 19 parks are managed as a national network, we explored how resources might be best allocated to address climate change. Each park's importance to the network's biodiversity conservation and revenue generation was estimated and used to weight overall vulnerability scores and ranks. Park vulnerability profiles showed distinct combinations of potential impacts of climate change and adaptive capacities; the former had a greater influence on vulnerability. Mapungubwe National Park emerged as the most vulnerable to climate change, despite its relatively high adaptive capacity, largely owing to large projected changes in species and resource use. Table Mountain National Park scored the lowest in overall vulnerability. Climate change vulnerability rankings differed markedly once importance weightings were applied; Kruger National Park was the most vulnerable under both importance scenarios. Climate change vulnerability assessment is fundamental to effective adaptation planning. Our PA assessment tool is the only tool that quantifies PA vulnerability to climate change in a comparative index. It may be used in data-rich and data-poor contexts to prioritize resource allocation across PA networks and can be applied from local to global scales 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a adaptive capacity 
650 4 |a biodiversidad 
650 4 |a biodiversity 
650 4 |a capacidad de adaptación 
650 4 |a impactos potenciales 
650 4 |a infraestructura 
650 4 |a infrastructure 
650 4 |a potential impacts 
650 4 |a tourism 
650 4 |a turismo 
650 4 |a 基础设施 
650 4 |a 旅游业 
650 4 |a 潜在影响适应能力 
650 4 |a 生物多样性 
700 1 |a Turpie, Jane K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Midgley, Guy  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Scheiter, Simon  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hannah, Lee  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Roehrdanz, Patrick R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Foden, Wendy B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 36(2022), 5 vom: 12. Okt., Seite e13941  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:5  |g day:12  |g month:10  |g pages:e13941 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13941  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 36  |j 2022  |e 5  |b 12  |c 10  |h e13941