|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
001 |
NLM341260495 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250303093004.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/cobi.13942
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n1137.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM341260495
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)35603483
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Broekman, Maarten J E
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Time-lagged effects of habitat fragmentation on terrestrial mammals in Madagascar
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2022
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 03.10.2022
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 10.09.2024
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Biodiversity is severely threatened by habitat destruction. As a consequence of habitat destruction, the remaining habitat becomes more fragmented. This results in time-lagged population extirpations in remaining fragments when these are too small to support populations in the long term. If these time-lagged effects are ignored, the long-term impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation will be underestimated. We quantified the magnitude of time-lagged effects of habitat fragmentation for 157 nonvolant terrestrial mammal species in Madagascar, one of the biodiversity hotspots with the highest rates of habitat loss and fragmentation. We refined species' geographic ranges based on habitat preferences and elevation limits and then estimated which habitat fragments were too small to support a population for at least 100 years given stochastic population fluctuations. We also evaluated whether time-lagged effects would change the threat status of species according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessment framework. We used allometric relationships to obtain the population parameters required to simulate the population dynamics of each species, and we quantified the consequences of uncertainty in these parameter estimates by repeating the analyses with a range of plausible parameter values. Based on the median outcomes, we found that for 34 species (22% of the 157 species) at least 10% of their current habitat contained unviable populations. Eight species (5%) had a higher threat status when accounting for time-lagged effects. Based on 0.95-quantile values, following a precautionary principle, for 108 species (69%) at least 10% of their habitat contained unviable populations, and 51 species (32%) had a higher threat status. Our results highlight the need to preserve continuous habitat and improve connectivity between habitat fragments. Moreover, our findings may help to identify species for which time-lagged effects are most severe and which may thus benefit the most from conservation actions
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a IUCN Red List
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Lista Roja de la UICN
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a allometric relationships
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a biodiversidad
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a biodiversity
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a destrucción del hábitat
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a deuda de extinción
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a extinction debt
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a fragmentación
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a fragmentation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a habitat destruction
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a persistencia poblacional
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a population persistence
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a relaciones alométricas
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 《世界自然保护联盟红色名录》
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 异速关系
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 灭绝债务
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 生境破坏
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 生物多样性
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 破碎化
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a 种群续存
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hilbers, Jelle P
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Schipper, Aafke M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Benítez-López, Ana
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Santini, Luca
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Huijbregts, Mark A J
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1989
|g 36(2022), 5 vom: 23. Okt., Seite e13942
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnas
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:36
|g year:2022
|g number:5
|g day:23
|g month:10
|g pages:e13942
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13942
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 36
|j 2022
|e 5
|b 23
|c 10
|h e13942
|